Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Daniel Lado v. State of Iowagreen2 sentences2025In claims of structural error, the applicant is not required to show specific prejudice, as the “underlying criminal proceeding is so unreliable the constitutional or statutory right to counsel entitles the defendant to a new proceeding without the need to show the error actually caused prejudice.” Id. at 252 . 2025Still, some attorney errors render the PCR proceedings “so unreliable” that the “statutory right to counsel entitles the defendant to a new proceeding without the need to show the error actually caused prejudice.” Id. at 252 . | 2 | 8 |
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen2 sentences2022When a structural error occurs, “the underlying . . . proceeding is so unreliable the constitutional or statutory right to counsel entitles 4 the defendant to a new proceeding without the need to show the error actually caused prejudice.” Id. 2018When a structural error occurs, "the underlying criminal proceeding is so unreliable the constitutional or statutory right to counsel entitles the defendant to a new proceeding without the need to show the error actually caused prejudice." Id. | 1 | 4 |
Fullenwider v. Stategreen1 sentence2014We begin under “a strong presumption that the performance of counsel falls within a wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Fullenwider v. State, 674 N.W.2d 73, 75 (Iowa 2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.