Patterson motion (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Patterson motion in Illinois

11 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Vancura v. Katrisgreen
ill · 2010 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018See Vancura v. Katris , 238 Ill. 2d 352 , 369, 345 Ill.Dec. 485 , 939 N.E.2d 328 (2010).

2018See Vancura v. Katris , 238 Ill. 2d 352 , 369, 345 Ill.Dec. 485 , 939 N.E.2d 328 (2010).

22
People v. Graygreen
ill · 2017 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021See People v. Gray, 2017 IL 120958, ¶ 50 (“[s]elf-defense is an affirmative defense, and once it is raised, the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense, in addition to proving the elements of the charged offense”). ¶ 35 Under section 7-1 of the Criminal Code of 2012, “[a] person is justified in the use of force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or another against such other’s imminent use of unlawful force.” If a person uses force intended or likely

2021See People v. Gray, 2017 IL 120958, ¶ 50 (“[s]elf-defense is an affirmative defense, and once it is raised, the State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act in self-defense, in addition to proving the elements of the charged offense”). ¶ 35 Under section 7-1 of the Criminal Code of 2012, “[a] person is justified in the use of force against another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or another against such other’s imminent use of unlawful force.” If a person uses force intended or likely

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Patterson green
ill · 2000
2 sentences

2017In People v. Patterson, 192 Ill. 2d 93 (2000), Patterson filed a postconviction petition in which he sought to present the opinion of an expert who found that the evidence at trial supported Patterson’s claim that police coerced him to confess.

2017In People v. Patterson, 192 Ill. 2d 93 (2000), Patterson filed a postconviction petition in which he sought to present the opinion of an expert who found that the evidence at trial supported Patterson’s claim that police coerced him to confess.

32016–2017
Dubina v. Mesirow Realty Development, Inc. green
ill · 1997
2 sentences

2018(We will treat Bauman and Anderson as interchangeable with Brown.) Unlike dismissals with prejudice ( Hudson , 228 Ill. 2d at 473 , 321 Ill.Dec. 306 , 889 N.E.2d 210 ; Dubina , 178 Ill. 2d at 503 , 227 Ill.Dec. 389 , 687 N.E.2d 871 ), "[t]he denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order * * *. [Citation.] An exception exists where the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the circuit court has granted one, disposing of all the issues in the case ." (Emphasis added.) Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC , 2017 IL App (1st) 150383 , ¶ 95, 411 Ill.Dec. 877 , 74 N.E.3d 186 .

2018(We will treat Bauman and Anderson as interchangeable with Brown.) Unlike dismissals with prejudice ( Hudson , 228 Ill. 2d at 473 , 321 Ill.Dec. 306 , 889 N.E.2d 210 ; Dubina , 178 Ill. 2d at 503 , 227 Ill.Dec. 389 , 687 N.E.2d 871 ), "[t]he denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order * * *. [Citation.] An exception exists where the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the circuit court has granted one, disposing of all the issues in the case ." (Emphasis added.) Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC , 2017 IL App (1st) 150383 , ¶ 95, 411 Ill.Dec. 877 , 74 N.E.3d 186 .

22018–2018
Hudson v. City of Chicago green
ill · 2008
2 sentences

2018(We will treat Bauman and Anderson as interchangeable with Brown.) Unlike dismissals with prejudice ( Hudson , 228 Ill. 2d at 473 , 321 Ill.Dec. 306 , 889 N.E.2d 210 ; Dubina , 178 Ill. 2d at 503 , 227 Ill.Dec. 389 , 687 N.E.2d 871 ), "[t]he denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order * * *. [Citation.] An exception exists where the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the circuit court has granted one, disposing of all the issues in the case ." (Emphasis added.) Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC , 2017 IL App (1st) 150383 , ¶ 95, 411 Ill.Dec. 877 , 74 N.E.3d 186 .

2018(We will treat Bauman and Anderson as interchangeable with Brown.) Unlike dismissals with prejudice ( Hudson , 228 Ill. 2d at 473 , 321 Ill.Dec. 306 , 889 N.E.2d 210 ; Dubina , 178 Ill. 2d at 503 , 227 Ill.Dec. 389 , 687 N.E.2d 871 ), "[t]he denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order * * *. [Citation.] An exception exists where the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the circuit court has granted one, disposing of all the issues in the case ." (Emphasis added.) Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC , 2017 IL App (1st) 150383 , ¶ 95, 411 Ill.Dec. 877 , 74 N.E.3d 186 .

22018–2018
Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC green
illappct · 2017
2 sentences

2018(We will treat Bauman and Anderson as interchangeable with Brown.) Unlike dismissals with prejudice ( Hudson , 228 Ill. 2d at 473 , 321 Ill.Dec. 306 , 889 N.E.2d 210 ; Dubina , 178 Ill. 2d at 503 , 227 Ill.Dec. 389 , 687 N.E.2d 871 ), "[t]he denial of a summary judgment motion is not a final order * * *. [Citation.] An exception exists where the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment and the circuit court has granted one, disposing of all the issues in the case ." (Emphasis added.) Fogt v. 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC , 2017 IL App (1st) 150383 , ¶ 95, 411 Ill.Dec. 877 , 74 N.E.3d 186 .

2018By granting Patterson’s motion only as to liability, the -5- court did not “dispos[e] of all the issues in the case.” Id.

22018–2018
People v. Deloney green
illappct · 2003
2 sentences

2006On appeal from this dismissal, the defendant argued, among other things, that the trial court, in applying the Patterson test, “exceeded its scope of review in the first stage by assessing the merits of the evidence and *** applied ‘an outcome determinative test’ rather than merely determining whether the petition stated the ‘gist of a constitutional claim.’ ” Deloney, 341 Ill.

2006On appeal from this dismissal, the defendant argued, among other things, that the trial court, in applying the Patterson test, “exceeded its scope of review in the first stage by assessing the merits of the evidence and *** applied ‘an outcome determinative test’ rather than merely determining whether the petition stated the ‘gist of a constitutional claim.’ ” Deloney, 341 Ill.

22006–2006
People v. Edwards green
ill · 2001
2 sentences

2006Edwards, 197 Ill. 2d at 246 .

2006Edwards, 197 Ill. 2d at 246 .

22006–2006
People v. Bass green
illappct · 2018
2 sentences

2022It merely means that counsel found no further evidence to support Patterson’s claim of self-defense. ¶ 33 To the extent that Patterson claims that counsel should have amended the petition, we find the case of People v. Bass, 2018 IL App (1st) 152650 , to be instructive.

2022It merely means that counsel found no further evidence to support Patterson’s claim of self-defense. ¶ 33 To the extent that Patterson claims that counsel should have amended the petition, we find the case of People v. Bass, 2018 IL App (1st) 152650 , to be instructive.

12022–2022
People v. Reyes green
illappct · 2015
1 sentence

2015The court rejected the Patterson defendant’s reliance on the eighth amendment analyses in Roper, Graham, and Miller to support his due process claims, noting that “a constitutional challenge raised under one theory cannot be supported by decisional law based -6- 2015 IL App (2d) 120471 purely on another provision.” Id. ¶ 97.

12015–2015
People v. Trass green
illappct · 1985
1 sentence

1986App. 3d 455, 460-61 , 483 N.E.2d 567 .) Here, in contrast, Patterson’s defense was not antagonistic to Thomas’ defense, and Patterson’s redacted statement, even when considered with other evidence, did not directly conflict with Thomas’ defense.

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

IN 80 (1978–2026) CA 15 (1990–2024) NJ 13 (2017–2026) TX 13 (1921–2025) OH 13 (2001–2026) GA 12 (1988–2025) IL 11 (1986–2022) NY 10 (1992–2026) CT 8 (2007–2021) FL 7 (2000–2019) AL 6 (2004–2024) NV 4 (2013–2022) UT 4 (1995–2017) DE 4 (2010–2023) AZ 4 (2004–2025) WI 4 (2000–2020) LA 4 (1990–2010) WV 3 (1986–2022) DC 3 (1989–2010) PA 3 (1968–2023) MO 3 (1992–2019) NE 3 (1987–2019) VA 3 (1986–2006) WY 2 (2025–2025) MD 2 (2010–2021) NM 2 (2018–2019) AK 2 (2017–2022) KS 2 (2020–2021) MN 2 (2003–2011) ID 2 (2000–2014) MS 2 (1993–2015) OK 2 (2000–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check