11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tischer v. Jordangreen2 sentences2010App. 3d at 980 (“[D]elay, even when inadvertent and unintentional, provides no support for Long’s position because the reasonable diligence requirement in Supreme Court Rule 103(b) is not based upon a subjective test of plaintiff’s intent but rather upon the objective test of reasonable diligence in effectuating service”), citing Tischer v. Jordan, 269 Ill. 2010App. 3d at 980 ("[D]elay, even when inadvertent and unintentional, provides no support for Long's position because the reasonable diligence requirement in Supreme Court Rule 103(b) is not based upon a subjective test of plaintiffs intent but rather upon the objective test of reasonable diligence in effectuating service"), citing Tischer v. Jordan , 269 Ill. | 1 | 4 |
Dutch Farm Meats, Inc. v. Horizon Foods, Inc.green1 sentence2021Additionally, the reasonable diligence standard in section 5.25(b)(2) of the Act (805 ILCS 5/5.25(b)(2) (West 2010)) - 20 - Nos. 1-19-1669 & 1-19-2124 (cons.) requires only service attempts on the registered agent at the registered office and does not “require attempted service on a corporate officer or other agent.” Dutch Farm Meats, Inc. v. Horizon Foods, Inc., 275 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Catlett v. Novakgreen2 sentences1999In Catlett v. Novak, 116 Ill. 2d 63, 70 , 506 N.E.2d 586, 590 (1987), the court again held there is no “absolute right” to voluntary dismissal under section 2—1009 when that section conflicts with supreme court rules. 1999In Catlett v. Novak, 116 Ill. 2d 63, 70 , 506 N.E.2d 586, 590 (1987), the court again held there is no “absolute right” to voluntary dismissal under section 2—1009 when that section conflicts with supreme court rules. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Dillon
green
2 sentences2010App. 3d 301, 307 (1995), and Lewis v. Dillon, 352 Ill. 2010App. 3d 301 , 307 (1995), and Lewis v. Dillon , 352 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Kahle v. John Deere Co.
green
2 sentences1987The plaintiff cites this court’s decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. 1987The plaintiff cites this court's decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill.2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill.2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill.2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Franzese v. Trinko
green
2 sentences1987The plaintiff cites this court’s decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. 1987The plaintiff cites this court's decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill.2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill.2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill.2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp.
green
2 sentences1987The plaintiff cites this court’s decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. 1987The plaintiff cites this court's decisions in Kahle v. John Deere Co. (1984), 104 Ill.2d 302 , Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp. (1977), 66 Ill.2d 616 , and Franzese v. Trinko (1977), 66 Ill.2d 136 , as support for his position that he has an absolute right to refile his complaint within one year of a voluntary dismissal. | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Segal v. Sacco
green
1 sentence2026In Segal, 136 Ill. 2d 282 , our supreme court set out seven factors to be considered when deciding a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 103(b). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Marks v. Rueben H. Donnelley, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020We have discerned no divergence in the Rule 103(b) cases such as the two lines of cases on section 2–1401 petitions.” Marks, 260 Ill. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Cohen v. Wood Bros. Steel Stamping Co.
green
1 sentence1994App. 3d 354 , 592 N.E.2d 59 , in asking that the reasonable diligence requirement be relaxed in the interests of fairness. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.