11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1943–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2018I would also ask to read that into the record." This stipulation stated, in relevant part, that "[d]efendant's *426 blood was taken at Lutheran General Hospital Emergency Room on July 6, 2012," and it asked the trial court "to take judicial notice that defendant's whole blood equivalent result is .259 grams per deciliter." " 'A criminal defendant may waive, by stipulation, the need to prove all or part of the case that the State has brought against him.' " People v. Toliver , 2016 IL App (1st) 141064 , ¶ 31, 407 Ill.Dec. 860 , 64 N.E.3d 659 (quoting People v. Washington , 343 Ill. 2018I would also ask to read that into the record.” This stipulation stated, in relevant part, that “[d]efendant’s blood was taken at Lutheran General Hospital Emergency Room on July 6, 2012,” and it asked the trial court “to take judicial notice that defendant’s whole blood equivalent result is .259 grams per deciliter.” “ ‘A criminal defendant may waive, by stipulation, the need to prove all or part of the case that the State has brought against him.’ ” People v. Toliver, 2016 IL App (1st) 141064, ¶ 31 (quoting People v. Washington, 343 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Tolivergreen2 sentences2018I would also ask to read that into the record." This stipulation stated, in relevant part, that "[d]efendant's *426 blood was taken at Lutheran General Hospital Emergency Room on July 6, 2012," and it asked the trial court "to take judicial notice that defendant's whole blood equivalent result is .259 grams per deciliter." " 'A criminal defendant may waive, by stipulation, the need to prove all or part of the case that the State has brought against him.' " People v. Toliver , 2016 IL App (1st) 141064 , ¶ 31, 407 Ill.Dec. 860 , 64 N.E.3d 659 (quoting People v. Washington , 343 Ill. 2018I would also ask to read that into the record." This stipulation stated, in relevant part, that "[d]efendant's *426 blood was taken at Lutheran General Hospital Emergency Room on July 6, 2012," and it asked the trial court "to take judicial notice that defendant's whole blood equivalent result is .259 grams per deciliter." " 'A criminal defendant may waive, by stipulation, the need to prove all or part of the case that the State has brought against him.' " People v. Toliver , 2016 IL App (1st) 141064 , ¶ 31, 407 Ill.Dec. 860 , 64 N.E.3d 659 (quoting People v. Washington , 343 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Lewisgreen1 sentence2026We disagree. ¶ 61 The Illinois Supreme Court, in People v. Lewis, 103 Ill. 2d 111, 112 (1984), addressed whether, “following a finding that an accused is not fit to stand trial, a later finding of fitness may be based on stipulated evidence.” In answering that question, the court distinguished between a stipulation agreeing to the fact that a defendant is fit, and therefore accepting the expert’s opinion as true, versus a stipulation agreeing to the contents of an expert’s opinion on defendant’s fitness. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Harveygreen1 sentence2016People v. Harvey, 211 Ill. 2d 368, 385 (2004); People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cartergreen1 sentence2016People v. Harvey, 211 Ill. 2d 368, 385 (2004); People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Campbell
green
2 sentences2023Further, the court found it was legitimate trial strategy for defense counsel to do so, stating “[d]efense counsel used the stipulation to establish defendant’s lack of any criminal intent,” and - 19 - “the stipulation also allowed defense counsel to present evidence that there was a reasonable and legitimate explanation for defendant’s entry into the premises.” Id. at 220 . 2009Although the stipulation contained Hoerr's statement that defendant did not have permission to enter the residence, the stipulation also allowed defense counsel to present evidence that there was a reasonable and legitimate explanation for defendant's entry into the premises." Campbell, 208 Ill.2d at 220 , 280 Ill.Dec. 684 , 802 N.E.2d 1205 . | 3 | 2009–2023 |
People v. Haynes
green
1 sentence2026Haynes, 174 Ill. 2d at 226 . ¶ 60 Defendant contends that the stipulation itself was improper and the trial court’s sole reliance on the stipulation was error. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
People v. Krankel
green
1 sentence2023The petitioner further contended that pursuant to People v. Krankel, 102 Ill. 2d 181 (1984) his case should be remanded for an additional inquiry into his posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel because the circuit court failed to adequately inquire into the stipulation that defense counsel admittedly 12 No. 1-21-1588 failed to enter. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Thornton
green
2 sentences1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . 1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
People v. Collins
green
2 sentences1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . 1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
People v. Killion
neutral
2 sentences1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . 1974People v. Collins (1973), 14 Ill.App.3d 446 , 302 N.E.2d 709 ; People v. Killion (1969), 113 Ill.App.2d 461 , 251 N.E.2d 411 ; People v. Thornton (1972), 4 Ill.App.3d 896 , 282 N.E.2d 276 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
The People v. Hegovic
neutral
2 sentences1966People v. Hegovic, 348 Ill. 58 ; overruled in People v. Norfleet, 29 Ill.2d 287 .” The stipulation of defense counsel does not show inadequate assistance of counsel. 1966People v. Hegovic, 348 Ill. 58 ; overruled in People v. Norfleet, 29 Ill.2d 287 ." The stipulation of defense counsel does not show inadequate assistance of counsel. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
The PEOPLE v. Norfleet
green
2 sentences1966People v. Hegovic, 348 Ill. 58 ; overruled in People v. Norfleet, 29 Ill.2d 287 .” The stipulation of defense counsel does not show inadequate assistance of counsel. 1966People v. Hegovic, 348 Ill. 58 ; overruled in People v. Norfleet, 29 Ill.2d 287 ." The stipulation of defense counsel does not show inadequate assistance of counsel. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
The People v. Stajduhar
green
1 sentence1943The plaintiff in error relies upon the cases of People v. Ross, 325 Ill. 417 , and People v. Stajduhar, 335 Ill. 412 , as supporting her contention, but these cases are not at all similar to the situation we have here. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
The People v. Ross
green
1 sentence1943The plaintiff in error relies upon the cases of People v. Ross, 325 Ill. 417 , and People v. Stajduhar, 335 Ill. 412 , as supporting her contention, but these cases are not at all similar to the situation we have here. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.