ambit rule in Louisiana

11 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Baldwingreen la · 1997 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015See, e.g., State v. Juniors, 03- 2425, p. 44 (La. 6/29/05), 915 So.2d 291, 325 (upholding exclusion of medical records offered by the defendant containing the statement that the victim had been shot “by a disgruntled employee” because the statement by an unidentified person “was not reasonably related to diagnosis and treatment” of the victim suffering from a gunshot wound to the head, “and, thus, was not admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to LSA-C.E. art. 803(4).”); see also State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La. 12/12/97), 705 So.2d 1076 , unpub’d appx. at xxii (trial court erre 2015See, e.g., State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 44 (La.6/29/05), 915 So.2d 291, 325 (upholding exclusion of medical records offered by the defendant containing the statement that the victim had been shot “by a disgruntled employee” because the statement by an unidentified person “was not reasonably related to diagnosis and treatment” of the victim suffering from a gunshot wound to the head, “and, thus, was not admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to LSA-C.E. art. 803(4).”); see also State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), 705 So.2d 1076 , unpub’d appx. at xxii (trial court erred i	1	1
State v. Juniorsgreen la · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015See, e.g., State v. Juniors, 03- 2425, p. 44 (La. 6/29/05), 915 So.2d 291, 325 (upholding exclusion of medical records offered by the defendant containing the statement that the victim had been shot “by a disgruntled employee” because the statement by an unidentified person “was not reasonably related to diagnosis and treatment” of the victim suffering from a gunshot wound to the head, “and, thus, was not admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to LSA-C.E. art. 803(4).”); see also State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La. 12/12/97), 705 So.2d 1076 , unpub’d appx. at xxii (trial court erre 2015See, e.g., State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 44 (La.6/29/05), 915 So.2d 291, 325 (upholding exclusion of medical records offered by the defendant containing the statement that the victim had been shot “by a disgruntled employee” because the statement by an unidentified person “was not reasonably related to diagnosis and treatment” of the victim suffering from a gunshot wound to the head, “and, thus, was not admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule pursuant to LSA-C.E. art. 803(4).”); see also State v. Baldwin, 96-1660 (La.12/12/97), 705 So.2d 1076 , unpub’d appx. at xxii (trial court erred i	1	1
Whalen v. Brinkmanngreen lactapp · 1972 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989In delineating the exception, our courts have used very precise language: an injunction may issue against conduct which is "forbidden by law" or "reprobated by law." See Apex Oil Co., supra, at 624; Smith, supra, at 274; Bossier v. Lovell, 410 So.2d 821, 827 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982), writ denied 414 So.2d 376 (La.1982); Whalen v. Brinkmann, 258 So.2d 145, 147 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972).	1	1
Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co.green lactapp · 1979 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989In delineating the exception, our courts have used very precise language: an injunction may issue against conduct which is "forbidden by law" or "reprobated by law." See Apex Oil Co., supra, at 624; Smith, supra, at 274; Bossier v. Lovell, 410 So.2d 821, 827 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982), writ denied 414 So.2d 376 (La.1982); Whalen v. Brinkmann, 258 So.2d 145, 147 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972).	1	1
Bossier v. Lovellgreen lactapp · 1982 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989In delineating the exception, our courts have used very precise language: an injunction may issue against conduct which is "forbidden by law" or "reprobated by law." See Apex Oil Co., supra, at 624; Smith, supra, at 274; Bossier v. Lovell, 410 So.2d 821, 827 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982), writ denied 414 So.2d 376 (La.1982); Whalen v. Brinkmann, 258 So.2d 145, 147 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Lovell v. Bossier green la · 1982 1 sentence 1989In delineating the exception, our courts have used very precise language: an injunction may issue against conduct which is "forbidden by law" or "reprobated by law." See Apex Oil Co., supra, at 624; Smith, supra, at 274; Bossier v. Lovell, 410 So.2d 821, 827 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982), writ denied 414 So.2d 376 (La.1982); Whalen v. Brinkmann, 258 So.2d 145, 147 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972).	1	1989–1989
Sandair Corp. v. Davis Industries neutral lactapp · 1985 1 sentence 1989This court in Sandair Corporation v. Davis Industries, 470 So.2d 279 (5th Cir.1985) decided past due rental payments on a month to month lease of a compressor were on an open account.	1	1989–1989
Kavlich v. Kramer green la · 1975 1 sentence 1988The slip and fall cases, Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So.2d 685 (La.1984); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 So.2d 486 (La.1976); and Kavlich, v. Kramer, 315 So.2d 282 (La.1975), as well as the protruding object cases, Ferrington v. McDaniel, 336 So.2d 482 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), are all grounded on the theory as expressed in Kavlich at 284 and 285: Self-service grocery stores require customers to look for and to find the objects which they wish to purchase.	1	1988–1988
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. green la · 1976 1 sentence 1988The slip and fall cases, Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So.2d 685 (La.1984); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 So.2d 486 (La.1976); and Kavlich, v. Kramer, 315 So.2d 282 (La.1975), as well as the protruding object cases, Ferrington v. McDaniel, 336 So.2d 482 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), are all grounded on the theory as expressed in Kavlich at 284 and 285: Self-service grocery stores require customers to look for and to find the objects which they wish to purchase.	1	1988–1988
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. green la · 1984 1 sentence 1988The slip and fall cases, Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So.2d 685 (La.1984); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 So.2d 486 (La.1976); and Kavlich, v. Kramer, 315 So.2d 282 (La.1975), as well as the protruding object cases, Ferrington v. McDaniel, 336 So.2d 482 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), are all grounded on the theory as expressed in Kavlich at 284 and 285: Self-service grocery stores require customers to look for and to find the objects which they wish to purchase.	1	1988–1988
Abelson v. Bosem neutral fladistctapp · 1976 1 sentence 1988The slip and fall cases, Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So.2d 685 (La.1984); Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 326 So.2d 486 (La.1976); and Kavlich, v. Kramer, 315 So.2d 282 (La.1975), as well as the protruding object cases, Ferrington v. McDaniel, 336 So.2d 482 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), are all grounded on the theory as expressed in Kavlich at 284 and 285: Self-service grocery stores require customers to look for and to find the objects which they wish to purchase.	1	1988–1988
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan green scotus · 1964 2 sentences 1987The defendants now move for summary judgment on the basis that the plaintiff is a public figure within the ambit of the doctrine enunciated by the U.S. Supreme 951 Court in New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 US 254 [ 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 ] (1964) and that therefore the plaintiff must show actual malice, i.e., the plaintiff must show that the statement was made with the knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard as to whether the statement was false or not. 1987The defendants now move for summary judgment on the basis that the plaintiff is a public figure within the ambit of the doctrine enunciated by the U.S. Supreme 951 Court in New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 US 254 [ 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 ] (1964) and that therefore the plaintiff must show actual malice, i.e., the plaintiff must show that the statement was made with the knowledge that the statement was false or with reckless disregard as to whether the statement was false or not.	1	1987–1987
Argersinger v. Hamlin green · 1972 2 sentences 1974He contends that the thirty days' suspended jail sentence is sufficient "actual deprivation of a person's liberty" to bring him within the ambit of the rule of Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 162 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972). 1974He contends that the thirty days' suspended jail sentence is sufficient "actual deprivation of a person's liberty" to bring him within the ambit of the rule of Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 , 92 162 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed.2d 530 (1972).	1	1974–1974
Breen v. Bituminous Casualty Company neutral lactapp · 1971 1 sentence 1974This takes the case out of the purview of Martin v. Travelers, supra, and brings it within the ambit of the rule found in Breen v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 249 So. 2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1971), where it was held that an insurer's action in cutting off weekly benefits knowing that the employee is at least partially disabled is arbitrary and warrants the imposition of the statutory penalties.	1	1974–1974
Martin v. Travelers Insurance Co. neutral lactapp · 1967 1 sentence 1974This takes the case out of the purview of Martin v. Travelers, supra, and brings it within the ambit of the rule found in Breen v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 249 So. 2d 338 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1971), where it was held that an insurer's action in cutting off weekly benefits knowing that the employee is at least partially disabled is arbitrary and warrants the imposition of the statutory penalties.	1	1974–1974
Manuel v. United States Fire Insurance Company green lactapp · 1962 1 sentence 1972The facts of this case appear to be more in line with those in the case of Manuel v. United States Fire Insurance Company, 140 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1962).	1	1972–1972
Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc. green la · 1969 2 sentences 1972We find the present matter within the ambit of the rule announced in Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc, 254 La. 37 , 222 So. 2d 849 . 1972We find the present matter within the ambit of the rule announced in Lawless v. Steel Erectors, Inc, 254 La. 37 , 222 So. 2d 849 .	1	1972–1972
Clark v. Spillman green lactapp · 1965 1 sentence 1967More specifically, we find this matter within the ambit of the rule enunciated in Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co., 245 La. 133 , 157 So.2d 467 , and followed in Clark v. Spillman, La.App., 173 So.2d 203 .	1	1967–1967
Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co. green la · 1963 2 sentences 1967More specifically, we find this matter within the ambit of the rule enunciated in Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co., 245 La. 133 , 157 So.2d 467 , and followed in Clark v. Spillman, La.App., 173 So.2d 203 . 1967More specifically, we find this matter within the ambit of the rule enunciated in Wesley v. Home Indemnity Co., 245 La. 133 , 157 So.2d 467 , and followed in Clark v. Spillman, La.App., 173 So.2d 203 .	1	1967–1967
Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. Canal Ins. Co. neutral lactapp · 1960 1 sentence 1966Co., La.App., 121 So.2d 769 , to the effect that in circumstances such as those shown, the utility company is entitled to recover its actual loss in wages, material and transportation costs in removing the damaged pole and replacing it with a new one.	1	1966–1966

Where else courts name it

NY 38 (1944–2017) CA 35 (1963–2023) MD 25 (1971–2024) PA 25 (1970–2023) TX 20 (1961–2024) UT 15 (1998–2026) OH 14 (1991–2025) GA 13 (1967–2024) FL 13 (1970–2025) IL 11 (1958–2016) LA 11 (1966–2015) CT 11 (1994–2017) NE 11 (1954–1986) WA 10 (1963–2021) IN 9 (1969–1999) MS 9 (1968–2025) TN 7 (1997–2025) MA 6 (1974–2011) MI 6 (1978–2013) WV 5 (1980–2021) NM 5 (1982–2020) KS 5 (1968–1994) CO 5 (1973–2015) VA 4 (1984–2000) NJ 4 (1986–2021) AL 3 (1975–1985) WY 3 (2014–2020) IA 2 (1986–2015) NH 2 (2004–2021) ME 2 (1997–2014) HI 2 (1997–2008) RI 2 (1975–2006) MO 2 (1992–1996) AR 2 (2003–2005) OR 2 (1985–1996) MN 2 (2008–2008) WI 2 (2001–2008) KY 2 (1968–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check