Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cushenberrygreen2 sentences2012In State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this court noted that the Hearold factors were “enunciated as ‘useful’ in determining whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove intent to distribute,” but this court held that evidence need not “fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find that requisite intent to distribute.” In the present case, the jury heard the testimony of Detective Bangham, who testified that he and his partner set up surveillance in an area that received citizen complaints of drug traf 2012In State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this court noted that the Hearold factors were “enunciated as ‘useful’ in determining whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove intent to distribute,” but this court held that evidence need not “fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find that requisite intent to distribute.” In the present case, the jury heard the testimony of Detective Bangham, who testified that he and his partner set up surveillance in an area that received citizen complaints of drug traf | 1 | 10 |
State v. Parkergreen1 sentence2003In State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6, (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this Court described the Hearold factors as "useful" but held that the evidence need not "fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find that the requisite intent to distribute." The issue of sufficiency relative to a purchase of narcotics with the alleged assistance of an intermediary was discussed by this Court in State v. Parker, 627 So.2d 210, 212 (La.App. 4 Cir.1993), as follows: "Distribute" is defined in LSA-R.S. 40:961(13) as "to deliver a controlled dangerous subst | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martingreen1 sentence2003State v. Martin, 310 So.2d 544, 546 (La. 1975); State v. Simon, 607 So.2d 793 (La.App. 1st Cir.1992), writ den., 612 So.2d 77 (La.1993).... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. King
green
2 sentences1999App. 4 Cir. 1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this court described the Hearold factors as "useful" but held that the evidence need not "fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find that the requisite intent to distribute." In State v. King, 95-1648 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/9/96) , 683 So.2d 1228 , the police proceeded to investigate, having received complaints of drug activity in the area. 1999In State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6, (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this court described the Hearold factors as "useful" but held that the evidence need not "fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find that the requisite intent to distribute." In State v. King, 95-1648 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/9/96) , 683 So.2d 1228 , the facts closely resemble the facts in the present case. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Jones, 97-2217 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99) , 731 So.2d 389, 399 , State v. Ask, 97-2061 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99) , 729 So.2d 664, 669 , and State v. Bentley, 97-1552 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98) , 728 So.2d 405, 412 , this Court found sufficient evidence to support convictions for possession of drugs with the intent to distribute based merely upon the amount of drugs seized, even though in no case did the officers involved observe any suspected transactions, nor did the State present any expert testimony in these cases to indicate that *1177 the amount of drugs seized was inconsistent wi | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Ash
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Jones, 97-2217 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99) , 731 So.2d 389, 399 , State v. Ask, 97-2061 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99) , 729 So.2d 664, 669 , and State v. Bentley, 97-1552 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98) , 728 So.2d 405, 412 , this Court found sufficient evidence to support convictions for possession of drugs with the intent to distribute based merely upon the amount of drugs seized, even though in no case did the officers involved observe any suspected transactions, nor did the State present any expert testimony in these cases to indicate that *1177 the amount of drugs seized was inconsistent wi | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Howard
green
1 sentence2009Moreover, this Court noted in Howard that “[i]n State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6 (La.App. 4th Cir.1/31/95), 650 So.2d 783, 786 , this Court described the Hearold factors as ‘useful’ but held that the evidence need not ‘fall squarely within the factors enunciated to be sufficient for the jury to find the requisite intent to distribute.’ ” Howard, at pp. 22-23, 805 So.2d at 1261 -1262 (quoting State v. Cushenberry, 94-1206, p. 6, 650 So.2d 783, 786 ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Bentley
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Jones, 97-2217 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/24/99) , 731 So.2d 389, 399 , State v. Ask, 97-2061 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/10/99) , 729 So.2d 664, 669 , and State v. Bentley, 97-1552 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/21/98) , 728 So.2d 405, 412 , this Court found sufficient evidence to support convictions for possession of drugs with the intent to distribute based merely upon the amount of drugs seized, even though in no case did the officers involved observe any suspected transactions, nor did the State present any expert testimony in these cases to indicate that *1177 the amount of drugs seized was inconsistent wi | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Simon
green
1 sentence2003State v. Martin, 310 So.2d 544, 546 (La. 1975); State v. Simon, 607 So.2d 793 (La.App. 1st Cir.1992), writ den., 612 So.2d 77 (La.1993).... | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Simon
green
1 sentence2003State v. Martin, 310 So.2d 544, 546 (La. 1975); State v. Simon, 607 So.2d 793 (La.App. 1st Cir.1992), writ den., 612 So.2d 77 (La.1993).... | 1 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Lavigne
green
2 sentences1997App. 4th Cir. 5/22/96), 675 So.2d 771, 775 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), 685 So.2d 140 . 1997App. 4th Cir. 5/22/96), 675 So.2d 771, 775 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), 685 So.2d 140 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Lavigne
green
2 sentences1997App. 4th Cir. 5/22/96), 675 So.2d 771, 775 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), 685 So.2d 140 . 1997App. 4th Cir. 5/22/96), 675 So.2d 771, 775 , writ denied, 96-1738 (La.1/10/97), 685 So.2d 140 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.