81 Pennsylvania opinions name it 6 courts 1898–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reifschneider v. Reifschneidergreen2 sentences1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reif schneidcr, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964); Fiumara v. Fiumara, 285 Pa.Super. 340 , 427 A.2d 667, 670 (1981). “[0]n appeal the question is not whether the appellate court would have reached the same conclusion, but whether the evidence is sufficient to support the chancellor’s conclusion.” Bokoch v. Noon, 420 Pa. 80, 85 , 215 A.2d 899, 901 (1966); Baker v. Zingelman, 259 Pa.Super. 441 , 393 A.2d 908, 910 (1 1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reif schneidcr, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964); Fiumara v. Fiumara, 285 Pa.Super. 340 , 427 A.2d 667, 670 (1981). “[0]n appeal the question is not whether the appellate court would have reached the same conclusion, but whether the evidence is sufficient to support the chancellor’s conclusion.” Bokoch v. Noon, 420 Pa. 80, 85 , 215 A.2d 899, 901 (1966); Baker v. Zingelman, 259 Pa.Super. 441 , 393 A.2d 908, 910 (1 | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth ex rel. Fort Pitt Bridge Works v. Continental Casualty Co.green2 sentences1969Neither party objects to the lower court's ruling that, under our decision in Fort Pitt Bridge Works, supra, interest should be included in the judgment ( 429 Pa. at 369, 370 ). 1969Neither party objects to the lower court’s ruling that, under our decision in Fort Pitt Bridge Works, supra, interest should be included in the judgment ( 429 Pa. at 369, 370 ). | 2 | 2 |
A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. White & Cunninghamgreen2 sentences1970“Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc me based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: * Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., sup 1968In Hookey Adoption Case, 419 Pa. 583, 589 , 215 A. 2d 860, 862 (1966), Mr. Justice JONES, writing for a unanimous court, indicated that this Court's decision was based on whether "there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding . . . ." *170 In Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827, 830 (1964), this Court, again per Mr. Justice JONES, stated that in a will case the orphans' court decision as to testamentary capacity and undue influence is "controlling provided such findings are based upon legally competent and sufficient evidence and our scope of review is to determine whether the | 1 | 3 |
Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroadgreen2 sentences1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reifschneider, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964), citing Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 408 Pa. 276 , 183 A.2d 544 (1962); Chambers v. Chambers, 406 Pa. 50 , 176 A.2d 673 (1962). 1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reifschneider, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964), citing Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 408 Pa. 276 , 183 A.2d 544 (1962); Chambers v. Chambers, 406 Pa. 50 , 176 A.2d 673 (1962). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Latrobe Armed Services Ass'ngreen2 sentences1981(Emphasis-in original.) “Our scope of review in liquor license revocation cases is limited to determining whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion.” Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Latrobe Armed Services Association, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 199, 201 , 329 A.2d 549, 550 (1974). 1981(Emphasis-in original.) “Our scope of review in liquor license revocation cases is limited to determining whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion.” Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Latrobe Armed Services Association, 16 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 199, 201 , 329 A.2d 549, 550 (1974). | 1 | 2 |
Chambers v. Chambersgreen2 sentences1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reifschneider, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964), citing Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 408 Pa. 276 , 183 A.2d 544 (1962); Chambers v. Chambers, 406 Pa. 50 , 176 A.2d 673 (1962). 1981Our scope of review is therefore to determine if such findings are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law.” Reifschneider v. Reifschneider, 413 Pa. 342, 344 , 196 A.2d 324, 325 (1964), citing Penneys v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 408 Pa. 276 , 183 A.2d 544 (1962); Chambers v. Chambers, 406 Pa. 50 , 176 A.2d 673 (1962). | 1 | 2 |
Williams v. McCarrollgreen2 sentences1964The findings of fact of a chancellor, approved by the court en banc, are controlling provided such findings are based upon legally competent and sufficient evidence and our scope of review is to determine whether the findings of fact are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa. 281, 298 , 97 A. 2d 14 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa. 362, 367 , 141 A. 2d 362 ; Girsh Trust, 410 Pa. 455, 467 , 189 A. 2d 852 . 1964The findings of fact of a chancellor, approved by the court en banc, are controlling provided such findings are based upon legally competent and sufficient evidence and our scope of review is to determine whether the findings of fact are supported by sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa. 281, 298 , 97 A. 2d 14 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa. 362, 367 , 141 A. 2d 362 ; Girsh Trust, 410 Pa. 455, 467 , 189 A. 2d 852 . | 1 | 2 |
In Re Estate of Clarkgreen2 sentences2017The test we apply on review is not whether we “would have reached the same result, but - 13 - J-A27022-17 rather whether the findings of fact approved by the [orphans’] court . . . are based upon legally competent and sufficient evidence and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion.” In re Estate of Clark, 334 A.2d 628, 635 (Pa. 1975). 2017“The resolution of a question as to the existence of undue influence is inextricably linked to the assignment of the burden of proof.” In re Estate of Smaling, 80 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa. Super. 2013) (quoting In re Clark’s Estate, 334 A.2d at 632 ). | 1 | 1 |
In re Estate of Smalinggreen1 sentence2017“The resolution of a question as to the existence of undue influence is inextricably linked to the assignment of the burden of proof.” In re Estate of Smaling, 80 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa. Super. 2013) (quoting In re Clark’s Estate, 334 A.2d at 632 ). | 1 | 1 |
Buffalo Township v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2015Whether the court below committed error of law by holding that there was an implied easement merely because the sewer line in question had been in existence for fifty years although wholly unknown to the [Carrolls] and their predecessor landowners where [Gurecka] cannot establish that her property would be rendered uninhabitable as she can readily tap into the public sewer line through an express right of way that is also downhill of her property and also across Forest Glen Road. -5- J-A07019-15 Appellants’ Brief, at 4.1 “When reviewing the grant or denial of a final or permanent injunction, a | 1 | 1 |
Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Boehmgreen1 sentence2015In Bucciarelli v. DeLisa, 691 A.2d 446 (Pa. 1997), our Supreme Court noted: The traditional test for implied easement at severance of title is set out in Burns Manufacturing v. Boehm, 356 A.2d 763, 767 (Pa. 1976): It has long been held in this Commonwealth that although the language of a granting clause does not contain an express reservation of an easement in favor of the grantor, such an interest may be reserved by implication, and this is so notwithstanding that the easement is not essential for the beneficial use of the property. . . . | 1 | 1 |
Moure v. Raeuchlegreen2 sentences2005Moure, 529 Pa. 394 , 604 A.2d 1003, 1007 (1992). ¶ 32 For these same reasons, it is also a meritless assertion that “the court below committed an error of law in denying a request for a directed verdict as to the negligence of defendant Vicente Gracias, M.D.” Appellant’s Brief, at 23. 2005Moure, 529 Pa. 394 , 604 A.2d 1003, 1007 (1992). ¶ 32 For these same reasons, it is also a meritless assertion that “the court below committed an error of law in denying a request for a directed verdict as to the negligence of defendant Vicente Gracias, M.D.” Appellant’s Brief, at 23. | 1 | 1 |
| In re Revocation of Hotel Liquor License No. H-322, Amusement Permit No. AP-17442 & Sunday Sales Permit No. SS-3743, Issued to Mooneygreen | 1 | 1 |
| New Sorrento, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Bokoch v. Noongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Baker v. Zingelmangreen | 1 | 1 |
| Fiumara v. Fiumaragreen | 1 | 1 |
| Treitinger Willgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Dougherty v. Philadelphia National Bankgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Greengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hookey Adoption Casegreen | 1 | 1 |
| De Luca v. De Lucagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brightbill v. Boeshoregreen | 1 | 1 |
| Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Luzerne Township v. Fayette Countygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heights Fire Co. Liquor License Case
green
2 sentences1963It is our function to determine whether there is evidence to support the order from which the appeal has been taken, and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Heights Fire Company Liquor License Case, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 56 , 121 A. 2d 902 . 1963It is our function to determine whether there is evidence to support the order from which the appeal has been taken, and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Heights Fire Company Liquor License Case, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 56 , 121 A. 2d 902 . | 6 | 1958–1974 |
Philadelphia v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1985The second judgment was, therefore, likewise irregular and the court below committed no error in striking it off; Philadelphia v. Johnson, 23 Pa.Superior Ct. 591; s.c. 208 Pa. 645 . 1932The second judgment was, therefore, likewise irregular and the court below committed no error in striking it off: Philadelphia v. Johnson, 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 591 ; s. c., 208 Pa. 645 .” In the case of Philadelphia v. Johnson, 208 Pa. 645 , it was said by Judge Smith, who wrote the opinion for the Superior Court (page 646) : “In the history of the case it is said that ‘the suit was discontinued by the appellee;’ the plaintiff’s answer to the defendant’s application to vacate the judgment sets forth, first, that the judgment ‘was satisfied by reason of the fact that the action in ejectment was | 3 | 1908–1985 |
Commonwealth v. Wisnoff Co.
green
2 sentences1982Pennsylvania State Liquor Control Board v. Crossover, Inc., 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 260 , 410 A.2d 88 (1980); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Wisnoff Co., 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 371 , 318 A.2d 774 (1974). 1982Pennsylvania State Liquor Control Board v. Crossover, Inc., 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 260 , 410 A.2d 88 (1980); Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Wisnoff Co., 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 371 , 318 A.2d 774 (1974). | 3 | 1976–1982 |
Girsh Trust
green
2 sentences1970“Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc me based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: * Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., sup 1967Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc are based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., supra | 3 | 1964–1970 |
Dettra Will
green
2 sentences1970“Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc me based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: * Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., sup 1968In Hookey Adoption Case, 419 Pa. 583, 589 , 215 A. 2d 860, 862 (1966), Mr. Justice JONES, writing for a unanimous court, indicated that this Court's decision was based on whether "there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding . . . ." *170 In Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827, 830 (1964), this Court, again per Mr. Justice JONES, stated that in a will case the orphans' court decision as to testamentary capacity and undue influence is "controlling provided such findings are based upon legally competent and sufficient evidence and our scope of review is to determine whether the | 3 | 1967–1970 |
Mami's Liquor License Case
green
2 sentences1962The law involved in the present appeal was well stated by Judge Wright in Heights Fire Co. Liquor License Case, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 56, 60 , 121 A. 2d 902 , as follows: “The present appeal is in the nature of a certiorari in its broadest sense, and it is our function to determine whether there is evidence to support the order appealed from, and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Mami’s Liquor License Case, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 285 , 19 A. 2d 549 . 1962The law involved in the present appeal was well stated by Judge Wright in Heights Fire Co. Liquor License Case, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 56, 60 , 121 A. 2d 902 , as follows: “The present appeal is in the nature of a certiorari in its broadest sense, and it is our function to determine whether there is evidence to support the order appealed from, and whether the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Mami’s Liquor License Case, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 285 , 19 A. 2d 549 . | 3 | 1946–1962 |
In re Revocation of Hotel Liquor License
neutral
2 sentences1984Matter of Revocation of Hotel Liquor License, 73 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 198 , 457 A.2d 1035 (1983). 1984Matter of Revocation of Hotel Liquor License, 73 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 198 , 457 A.2d 1035 (1983). | 2 | 1983–1984 |
Durkin Contracting Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
green
2 sentences1978Durkin Contracting Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 211 , 293 A.2d 622 (1972). 1978Durkin Contracting Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 211 , 293 A.2d 622 (1972). | 2 | 1973–1978 |
Commonwealth v. Argonne Tavern, Inc.
green
2 sentences1978Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Argonne Tavern, Inc., 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 286 , 361 A.2d 480 (1976). 1978Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Argonne Tavern, Inc., 25 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 286 , 361 A.2d 480 (1976). | 2 | 1978–1978 |
McKay v. Board of Adjustment
neutral
2 sentences1974McKay v. Board of Adjustment, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 29 , 300 A. 2d 810 (1973). 1974McKay v. Board of Adjustment, 8 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 29 , 300 A. 2d 810 (1973). | 2 | 1974–1974 |
Lanning Will
green
2 sentences1970“Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc me based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: * Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., sup 1970“Where the issues are testamentary capacity, or undue influence, or an insane delusion or insanity, or confidential relationship, the test in an appellate Court is whether the findings of fact approved by the Court en banc me based upon legally competent and sufficiently convincing evidence, and whether the Court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: * Dettra Will, 415 Pa. 197, 201 , 202 A. 2d 827 ; Brantlinger Will, 418 Pa., supra; Hunter Will, 416 Pa., supra; Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313 , 200 A. 2d 392 ; Masciantonio Will, 392 Pa., supra; Williams v. McCarroll, 374 Pa., sup | 2 | 1967–1970 |
Abrams Will
green
2 sentences1968Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether or not the findings of fact are supported by sufficient, competent evidence, and whether or not the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Abrams Will, 419 Pa. 92 , 213 A. 2d 638 .” Zeedick Will, 421 Pa. 44, 46 , 218 A. 2d 755 . 1966Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether or not the findings of fact are supported by sufficient, competent evidence, and whether or not the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Abrams Will, 419 Pa. 92 , 213 A. 2d 638 (1965). | 2 | 1966–1968 |
Fedun v. MIKE'S CAFE INC.
green
2 sentences1968Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether or not the findings of fact are supported by sufficient, competent evidence, and whether or not the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Abrams Will, 419 Pa. 92 , 213 A. 2d 638 .” Zeedick Will, 421 Pa. 44, 46 , 218 A. 2d 755 . 1966Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether or not the findings of fact are supported by sufficient, competent evidence, and whether or not the court below committed an error of law or abused its discretion: Abrams Will, 419 Pa. 92 , 213 A. 2d 638 (1965). | 2 | 1966–1968 |
Enlisted Men's Club of Trafford Liquor License Case
green
2 sentences1962The Court of Quarter Sessions ‘does not have discretionary power to act in an arbitrary manner’ in reversing an order of the Board: Enlisted Men’s Club of Trafford Liquor License Case, 166 Pa. Superior Ct. 26 , 70 A. 2d 696 . 1962The Court of Quarter Sessions ‘does not have discretionary power to act in an arbitrary manner’ in reversing an order of the Board: Enlisted Men’s Club of Trafford Liquor License Case, 166 Pa. Superior Ct. 26 , 70 A. 2d 696 . | 2 | 1956–1962 |
Philadelphia v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1932The second judgment was, therefore, likewise irregular and the court below committed no error in striking it off: Philadelphia v. Johnson, 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 591 ; s. c., 208 Pa. 645 .” In the case of Philadelphia v. Johnson, 208 Pa. 645 , it was said by Judge Smith, who wrote the opinion for the Superior Court (page 646) : “In the history of the case it is said that ‘the suit was discontinued by the appellee;’ the plaintiff’s answer to the defendant’s application to vacate the judgment sets forth, first, that the judgment ‘was satisfied by reason of the fact that the action in ejectment was 1908The second judgment was, therefore, likewise irregular and the court below committed no error in striking it off: Philadelphia v. Johnson, 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 591 ; s. c. 208 Pa. 645 . | 2 | 1908–1932 |
Bucciarelli v. DeLisa
green
1 sentence2015In Bucciarelli v. DeLisa, 691 A.2d 446 (Pa. 1997), our Supreme Court noted: The traditional test for implied easement at severance of title is set out in Burns Manufacturing v. Boehm, 356 A.2d 763, 767 (Pa. 1976): It has long been held in this Commonwealth that although the language of a granting clause does not contain an express reservation of an easement in favor of the grantor, such an interest may be reserved by implication, and this is so notwithstanding that the easement is not essential for the beneficial use of the property. . . . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.
green
2 sentences1991The court below erred in holding that defendants’ evidence on the apportionment issue failed to meet the Eckenrod [v. GAF Corp., 375 Pa.Super. 187 , 544 A.2d 50 (1988)] test. 1991The court below erred in holding that defendants’ evidence on the apportionment issue failed to meet the Eckenrod [v. GAF Corp., 375 Pa.Super. 187 , 544 A.2d 50 (1988)] test. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Gramm Estate
green
2 sentences1989In re Gramm’s Estate, 437 Pa. 381 , 263 A.2d 445 (1970). 1989In re Gramm’s Estate, 437 Pa. 381 , 263 A.2d 445 (1970). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Graack v. Bd. Sup. L. Nazareth green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Parks v. Commonwealth green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Commonwealth v. Martin green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Commonwealth v. Riggins green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Spory Appeal green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Commonwealth v. Crossover, Inc. green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| In re Revocation of Catering Club Liquor License No. CC-949 neutral | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| In re Revocation of Club Liquor License No. C-5745 green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| In re Quaker City Development Co. green | 1 | 1981–1981 |
| Commonwealth v. Barrall green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Commonwealth v. Ronnie's Lounge, Inc. green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| Kresovich v. Fitzsimmons green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Niemiec v. Allegheny County Port Authority green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Commonwealth v. Taylor green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Commonwealth v. M.S.G., Inc. neutral | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Commonwealth v. Stamoolis green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Commonwealth v. Dennis green | 1 | 1974–1974 |
| Drop v. Board of Adjustment green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| Commonwealth ex rel. Tiscio v. Burke green | 1 | 1973–1973 |
| Commonwealth v. Feldman green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Commonwealth v. Scoleri green | 1 | 1970–1970 |
| Zeedick Will green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.