below committed error in North Carolina

1966The rule with respect to liability in cases of this character was so aptly stated by Connor, J., in the case of Briscoe v. Lighting and Power Co., 148 N.C. 396 , 62 S.E. 600 , we quote therefrom as follows: “It must be conceded that the liability for injuries to children sustained by reason of dangerous conditions on one’s premises is recognized and enforced in cases in which no such liability accrues to adults.

1966The rule with respect to liability in cases of this character was so aptly stated by Connor, J., in the case of Briscoe v. Lighting and Power Co., 148 N.C. 396 , 62 S.E. 600 , we quote therefrom as follows: “It must be conceded that the liability for injuries to children sustained by reason of dangerous conditions on one’s premises is recognized and enforced in cases in which no such liability accrues to adults.

1965Moreover, in addition to the above cited cases, the following authorities support this view: Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 197 Misc. 40 , 93 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , affirmed 197 Misc. 43 , 96 N.Y.S. 2d 153 ; Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co., 123 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 979 , 267 P. 2d 887 ; Wolf v. American Cas.

1965Moreover, in addition to the above cited cases, the following authorities support this view: Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 197 Misc. 40 , 93 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , affirmed 197 Misc. 43 , 96 N.Y.S. 2d 153 ; Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co., 123 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 979 , 267 P. 2d 887 ; Wolf v. American Cas.

1965Moreover, in addition to the above cited cases, the following authorities support this view: Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 197 Misc. 40 , 93 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , affirmed 197 Misc. 43 , 96 N.Y.S. 2d 153 ; Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co., 123 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 979 , 267 P. 2d 887 ; Wolf v. American Cas.

1965Moreover, in addition to the above cited cases, the following authorities support this view: Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 197 Misc. 40 , 93 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , affirmed 197 Misc. 43 , 96 N.Y.S. 2d 153 ; Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co., 123 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 979 , 267 P. 2d 887 ; Wolf v. American Cas.

1965Moreover, in addition to the above cited cases, the following authorities support this view: Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 197 Misc. 40 , 93 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , affirmed 197 Misc. 43 , 96 N.Y.S. 2d 153 ; Christoffer v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co., 123 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 979 , 267 P. 2d 887 ; Wolf v. American Cas.

1962Wright v. Wright, 216 N.C. 693 , 6 S.E. 2d 555 ” The defendant contends and insists that the court below committed error in not ascertaining the net current income of defendant and limiting any award to one-third thereof, citing G.S. 50-14.

1962Wright v. Wright, 216 N.C. 693 , 6 S.E. 2d 555 ” The defendant contends and insists that the court below committed error in not ascertaining the net current income of defendant and limiting any award to one-third thereof, citing G.S. 50-14.

1961This appeal presents for determination whether or not the court below committed error in its ruling to the effect that the judgment in the case of Carter v. Edwards constitutes an estoppel and bar to the plaintiff’s right to maintain this action against Johnny Avery Edwards. “(W)here the initial action is instituted by the passenger in one vehicle against the driver of the other vehicle, in which the passenger’s driver is joined for contribution, adjudication that the passenger’s driver was not guilty of negligence constituting a proximate cause of the accident, is res judicata in a subsequent

1961This appeal presents for determination whether or not the court below committed error in its ruling to the effect that the judgment in the case of Carter v. Edwards constitutes an estoppel and bar to the plaintiff’s right to maintain this action against Johnny Avery Edwards. “(W)here the initial action is instituted by the passenger in one vehicle against the driver of the other vehicle, in which the passenger’s driver is joined for contribution, adjudication that the passenger’s driver was not guilty of negligence constituting a proximate cause of the accident, is res judicata in a subsequent

1959This Court held in In re Wright, 228 N.C. 301 , 45 S.E. 2d 370 and in s.e. on rehearing, 228 N.C. 584 , 46 S.E. 2d 696 , that a petitioner is entitled to a review whenever the suspension, cancelation, or revocation is made in the discretion of the Department, whether under G.S. 20-16, G.S. 20-23, or any other provision of the statute.

1959This Court held in In re Wright, 228 N.C. 301 , 45 S.E. 2d 370 and in s.e. on rehearing, 228 N.C. 584 , 46 S.E. 2d 696 , that a petitioner is entitled to a review whenever the suspension, cancelation, or revocation is made in the discretion of the Department, whether under G.S. 20-16, G.S. 20-23, or any other provision of the statute.

1959This Court held in In re Wright, 228 N.C. 301 , 45 S.E. 2d 370 and in s.e. on rehearing, 228 N.C. 584 , 46 S.E. 2d 696 , that a petitioner is entitled to a review whenever the suspension, cancelation, or revocation is made in the discretion of the Department, whether under G.S. 20-16, G.S. 20-23, or any other provision of the statute.

1959This Court held in In re Wright, 228 N.C. 301 , 45 S.E. 2d 370 and in s.e. on rehearing, 228 N.C. 584 , 46 S.E. 2d 696 , that a petitioner is entitled to a review whenever the suspension, cancelation, or revocation is made in the discretion of the Department, whether under G.S. 20-16, G.S. 20-23, or any other provision of the statute.

1958Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688 , 32 S.E. 2d 209 .

1958Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688 , 32 S.E. 2d 209 .

1955Ordinarily, where the owner of land makes an enforceable contract to convey the land and the title to the property proves defective in some particular, or his estate is different from that which he agreed to convey, the vendee, at his election, may compel the conveyance of such interest as the vendor may have and obtain “a pecuniary compensation or abate *587 ment of the price proportioned to the amount and value of the defect in title or deficiency in the subject matter . ." Flowe v. Hartwick, 167 N.C. 448 , 83 S.E. 841 ; Timber Co. v. Wilson, 151 N.C. 154 , 65 S.E. 932 , 134 Am.

1955Ordinarily, where the owner of land makes an enforceable contract to convey the land and the title to the property proves defective in some particular, or his estate is different from that which he agreed to convey, the vendee, at his election, may compel the conveyance of such interest as the vendor may have and obtain “a pecuniary compensation or abate *587 ment of the price proportioned to the amount and value of the defect in title or deficiency in the subject matter . ." Flowe v. Hartwick, 167 N.C. 448 , 83 S.E. 841 ; Timber Co. v. Wilson, 151 N.C. 154 , 65 S.E. 932 , 134 Am.

1955Ordinarily, where the owner of land makes an enforceable contract to convey the land and the title to the property proves defective in some particular, or his estate is different from that which he agreed to convey, the vendee, at his election, may compel the conveyance of such interest as the vendor may have and obtain “a pecuniary compensation or abate *587 ment of the price proportioned to the amount and value of the defect in title or deficiency in the subject matter . ." Flowe v. Hartwick, 167 N.C. 448 , 83 S.E. 841 ; Timber Co. v. Wilson, 151 N.C. 154 , 65 S.E. 932 , 134 Am.

1955Ordinarily, where the owner of land makes an enforceable contract to convey the land and the title to the property proves defective in some particular, or his estate is different from that which he agreed to convey, the vendee, at his election, may compel the conveyance of such interest as the vendor may have and obtain “a pecuniary compensation or abate *587 ment of the price proportioned to the amount and value of the defect in title or deficiency in the subject matter . ." Flowe v. Hartwick, 167 N.C. 448 , 83 S.E. 841 ; Timber Co. v. Wilson, 151 N.C. 154 , 65 S.E. 932 , 134 Am.

1954This Court has discussed the law so many times and so recently in Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500 , 78 S.E. 2d 319 , and in Huskins v. Hospital, 238 N.C. 357 , 78 S.E. 2d 116 , as to when a temporary restraining order should or should not be issued, as well as when such order should be continued to the final hearing, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the subject here.

1954This Court has discussed the law so many times and so recently in Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500 , 78 S.E. 2d 319 , and in Huskins v. Hospital, 238 N.C. 357 , 78 S.E. 2d 116 , as to when a temporary restraining order should or should not be issued, as well as when such order should be continued to the final hearing, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the subject here.

1954This Court has discussed the law so many times and so recently in Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500 , 78 S.E. 2d 319 , and in Huskins v. Hospital, 238 N.C. 357 , 78 S.E. 2d 116 , as to when a temporary restraining order should or should not be issued, as well as when such order should be continued to the final hearing, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the subject here.

1954This Court has discussed the law so many times and so recently in Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500 , 78 S.E. 2d 319 , and in Huskins v. Hospital, 238 N.C. 357 , 78 S.E. 2d 116 , as to when a temporary restraining order should or should not be issued, as well as when such order should be continued to the final hearing, we deem it unnecessary to discuss the subject here.

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1945Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N. C., 694 , 24 S. E. (2d), 648 ; Wilder v. Medlin, 215 N. C., 542 , 2 S. E. (2d), 549 ; Wingler v. Miller, 223 N. C., 15 , 25 S. E. (2d), 160 ; Walston v. Coppersmith, 197 N. C., 407 , 149 S. E., 381 ; Boyd v. Williams, 207 N. C., 30 , 175 S. E., 832 ; Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 .

1940That the court below committed error in failing to charge the jury to some extent upon the evidence of the case, and in failing to charge the jury upon the law relative to a simple assault in accordance with cases: S. v. Brooks, 76 N. C., 1 , and S. v. Nash, 109 N. C., 824 .” This contention cannot be sustained.

1940That the court below committed error in failing to charge the jury to some extent upon the evidence of the case, and in failing to charge the jury upon the law relative to a simple assault in accordance with cases: S. v. Brooks, 76 N. C., 1 , and S. v. Nash, 109 N. C., 824 .” This contention cannot be sustained.