6 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1881–1901 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bartholomew v. First National Bank
neutral
2 sentences1901(Bartholomew v. National Bank, 57 Kan. 594 , 47 Pac. 519 ; Skinkle v. Huffman, 52 Neb. 20 , 71 N. W. 1004 ; Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & P. J. 1901(Bartholomew v. National Bank, 57 Kan. 594 , 47 Pac. 519 ; Skinkle v. Huffman, 52 Neb. 20 , 71 N. W. 1004 ; Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & P. J. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Skinkle v. Huffman
green
2 sentences1901(Bartholomew v. National Bank, 57 Kan. 594 , 47 Pac. 519 ; Skinkle v. Huffman, 52 Neb. 20 , 71 N. W. 1004 ; Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & P. J. 1901(Bartholomew v. National Bank, 57 Kan. 594 , 47 Pac. 519 ; Skinkle v. Huffman, 52 Neb. 20 , 71 N. W. 1004 ; Union Trust Co. v. Monticello & P. J. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Freeman
green
1 sentence1899The court below committed no error in its rulings against the -admissibility of testimony as to the age, health, earning capacity, savings and domestic connections and relations of plaintiff’s intestate, nor in charging the jury that compensatory -damages are not recoverable in this action. — Richmond & Danville Railroad Co. v. Freeman, 97 Ala. 289 . ■The following charges were also given for .the defendant: (1.) “If you (believe from the evidence that tlie negligence complained of is so 'slight or so characterized by mitigating circumstances as that the jury would be justified in the impositi | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Reynolds v. United States
green
1 sentence1890Law, §309; Reynolds v. United States, 98 U. S. 145 .) Upon a careful examination of the errors complained of, we are satisfied that the court below committed no error, and recommend an affirmance of the judgment. | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Wood v. National Water Works Co. of New York
green
1 sentence1888(Wood v. Water Works Co., 33 Kas. 590 .) The ruling and judgment of the district court sustaining the demurrer to the third defense will be overruled, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed. | 1 | 1888–1888 |
State v. O'Kane
neutral
1 sentence1883Code, §§ 121,122; The State v. O’Kane, 23 Kas. 244 .) We do not think that the court below committed error in permitting such a verdict to be found, and in rendering judgment thereon. | 1 | 1883–1883 |
Sloan v. Beebe
neutral
1 sentence1881(Sloan v. Beebe, 24 Kas. 343 .) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed. | 1 | 1881–1881 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.