vendor claim in Louisiana

2002Chenevert v. Lemoine, et al., 27 So. 56 (1900) and Mut v. Mut 222 So.2d 100 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1969).

1999Chenevert v. Lemoine, et al., 27 So. 56 (1900) and Mut v. Mut 222 So.2d 100 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1969).

1926Carmouche, Max Barnett, etc., Opponent, 146 La. 798 , 84 South. 59 , the court held: “A purchaser on credit of movable property may Validly give .it in pledge to a third person who knows that he has hot paid the price, but is otherwise in good faith, so as to vest in the pledgee a right superior to that of the vendor whose privilege thereupon ceases by reason of the property having passed out of the possession of the vendee.” In Boylans, etc., vs.

1926Carmouche, Max Barnett, etc., Opponent, 146 La. 798 , 84 South. 59 , the court held: “A purchaser on credit of movable property may Validly give .it in pledge to a third person who knows that he has hot paid the price, but is otherwise in good faith, so as to vest in the pledgee a right superior to that of the vendor whose privilege thereupon ceases by reason of the property having passed out of the possession of the vendee.” In Boylans, etc., vs.

1981The owner at the time had a claim personally for the amount. " The purchaser by the act of purchase does not become invested with a right to the value of the property taken unless the right is transferred with the property. " (Emphasis added.) In Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company, 192 So.2d 646 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1966), writ den., 195 So.2d 143 , 250 La. 256 (1967), the court was faced with the issue of whether compensation is a personal right or whether it attaches to the land and passes to subsequent purchasers.

1981The owner at the time had a claim personally for the amount. " The purchaser by the act of purchase does not become invested with a right to the value of the property taken unless the right is transferred with the property. " (Emphasis added.) In Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company, 192 So.2d 646 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1966), writ den., 195 So.2d 143 , 250 La. 256 (1967), the court was faced with the issue of whether compensation is a personal right or whether it attaches to the land and passes to subsequent purchasers.

1981The owner at the time had a claim personally for the amount. " The purchaser by the act of purchase does not become invested with a right to the value of the property taken unless the right is transferred with the property. " (Emphasis added.) In Veillon v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Company, 192 So.2d 646 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1966), writ den., 195 So.2d 143 , 250 La. 256 (1967), the court was faced with the issue of whether compensation is a personal right or whether it attaches to the land and passes to subsequent purchasers.

1963Daigle v. Calcasieu National Bank of Lake Charles, 200 La. 1006 , 9 So.2d 394 and Baldwin et al. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 185 La. 1051 , 171 So. 442 , did deal with omnibus clauses and held that, quoting from the Baldwin opinion 171 So. at page 446 ; “A deed which fails to describe by legal subdivisions the real estate intended to be sold and makes no reference to any deed, map, plat, latent, survey, or boundary by which the description may be ascertained is void as. to third parties for want of description of the thing sold.

1963Daigle v. Calcasieu National Bank of Lake Charles, 200 La. 1006 , 9 So.2d 394 and Baldwin et al. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 185 La. 1051 , 171 So. 442 , did deal with omnibus clauses and held that, quoting from the Baldwin opinion 171 So. at page 446 ; “A deed which fails to describe by legal subdivisions the real estate intended to be sold and makes no reference to any deed, map, plat, latent, survey, or boundary by which the description may be ascertained is void as. to third parties for want of description of the thing sold.

1963Daigle v. Calcasieu National Bank of Lake Charles, 200 La. 1006 , 9 So.2d 394 and Baldwin et al. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 185 La. 1051 , 171 So. 442 , did deal with omnibus clauses and held that, quoting from the Baldwin opinion 171 So. at page 446 ; “A deed which fails to describe by legal subdivisions the real estate intended to be sold and makes no reference to any deed, map, plat, latent, survey, or boundary by which the description may be ascertained is void as. to third parties for want of description of the thing sold.

1963Daigle v. Calcasieu National Bank of Lake Charles, 200 La. 1006 , 9 So.2d 394 and Baldwin et al. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co., 185 La. 1051 , 171 So. 442 , did deal with omnibus clauses and held that, quoting from the Baldwin opinion 171 So. at page 446 ; “A deed which fails to describe by legal subdivisions the real estate intended to be sold and makes no reference to any deed, map, plat, latent, survey, or boundary by which the description may be ascertained is void as. to third parties for want of description of the thing sold.

1939It was said in Salzman v. His Creditors, 2 Rob. 241, 244 , “It would be contrary to good faith, that the vendor of a claim, after receiving the price of it from the assignee, should, by his own act, prevent the latter from recovering the sum he has paid.” Ventress v. His Creditors, 20 La.Ann. 359 ; Barkdull v. Herwig, 30 La.Ann. 618 ; Reine v. Jack, 31 La.Ann. 859 ; Abney v. Walmsley, 33 La.Ann. 589 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Maureau, 37 La.Ann. 857 ; State Nat.

1939It was said in Salzman v. His Creditors, 2 Rob. 241, 244 , “It would be contrary to good faith, that the vendor of a claim, after receiving the price of it from the assignee, should, by his own act, prevent the latter from recovering the sum he has paid.” Ventress v. His Creditors, 20 La.Ann. 359 ; Barkdull v. Herwig, 30 La.Ann. 618 ; Reine v. Jack, 31 La.Ann. 859 ; Abney v. Walmsley, 33 La.Ann. 589 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Maureau, 37 La.Ann. 857 ; State Nat.

1939It was said in Salzman v. His Creditors, 2 Rob. 241, 244 , “It would be contrary to good faith, that the vendor of a claim, after receiving the price of it from the assignee, should, by his own act, prevent the latter from recovering the sum he has paid.” Ventress v. His Creditors, 20 La.Ann. 359 ; Barkdull v. Herwig, 30 La.Ann. 618 ; Reine v. Jack, 31 La.Ann. 859 ; Abney v. Walmsley, 33 La.Ann. 589 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Maureau, 37 La.Ann. 857 ; State Nat.

1939Bank v. Bryant, 49 La.Ann. 467 , 22 So. 89 .

1939Bank v. Bryant, 49 La.Ann. 467 , 22 So. 89 .

1939It was said in Salzman v. His Creditors, 2 Rob. 241, 244 , “It would be contrary to good faith, that the vendor of a claim, after receiving the price of it from the assignee, should, by his own act, prevent the latter from recovering the sum he has paid.” Ventress v. His Creditors, 20 La.Ann. 359 ; Barkdull v. Herwig, 30 La.Ann. 618 ; Reine v. Jack, 31 La.Ann. 859 ; Abney v. Walmsley, 33 La.Ann. 589 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Maureau, 37 La.Ann. 857 ; State Nat.

1936In Porter v. Town of Ville Platte, 158 La. 342, 343 , 104 So. 67, 69 , the plaintiff was employed by the town to furnish labor and material for the construction of a system of waterworks.

1936In Porter v. Town of Ville Platte, 158 La. 342, 343 , 104 So. 67, 69 , the plaintiff was employed by the town to furnish labor and material for the construction of a system of waterworks.

1926Brown, etc., 157 La. 325 , 102 South. 417, p. 332 , the court says: “No consideration of equity can enter into the determination of the right of privilege.

1926Brown, etc., 157 La. 325 , 102 South. 417, p. 332 , the court says: “No consideration of equity can enter into the determination of the right of privilege.

1905Bray 16 La. 352 -358.

1878His Creditors, in 2 Rob. 244 : “it would be contrary to good faith, that the vendor of a claim, after receiving the price of it from the assignee, should by his own act prevent the latter from receiving the sum he has paid.” See .also Troplong, Hypotheques, volume 1, number 367.