Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Liddell v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchangegreen2 sentences1998See generally 3 Michigan Law & Practice, Attorneys and Counselors, § 44, p 275, and Disciplinary Rule 2-106(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Ethics. ” *45 See also Liddell v DAIIE, 102 Mich App 636, 652 ; 302 NW2d 260 (1981), which applied the Crawley factors to the no-fault insurance scheme. 1998See generally 3 Michigan Law & Practice, Attorneys and Counselors, § 44, p 275, and Disciplinary Rule 2-106(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Ethics. ” *45 See also Liddell v DAIIE, 102 Mich App 636, 652 ; 302 NW2d 260 (1981), which applied the Crawley factors to the no-fault insurance scheme. | 3 | 5 |
Petterman v. Haverhill Farms, Incgreen2 sentences1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. 1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. | 1 | 3 |
Burke v. Angies, Incgreen2 sentences1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. 1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1996However, the factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of a fee include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) the professional standing and experience of the attorney; (2) the skill, time and labor involved; (3) the amount in question and the results achieved; (4) the difficulty of the case; (5) the expenses incurred; and (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client. [Id., p 737.] The Michigan Supreme Court adopted the Crawley standard in Wood v DAIIE, 413 Mich 573, 588 ; 321 NW2d 653 (1982). 1996However, the factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of a fee include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) the professional standing and experience of the attorney; (2) the skill, time and labor involved; (3) the amount in question and the results achieved; (4) the difficulty of the case; (5) the expenses incurred; and (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client. [Id., p 737.] The Michigan Supreme Court adopted the Crawley standard in Wood v DAIIE, 413 Mich 573, 588 ; 321 NW2d 653 (1982). | 5 | 1983–2007 |
Johnston v. Detroit Hoist & Crane Co.
green
2 sentences1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. 1986See Petterman v Haverhill Farms, 125 Mich App 30 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1983); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985), and Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985), lv den 422 Mich 966 (1985), where the Crawley factors were applied in the context of GCR 1963, 316.8. | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America
green
2 sentences1999Smolen, supra at 296 ; Schellenberg v Rochester Michigan Lodge No 2225, 228 Mich App 20, 45 ; 577 NW2d 163 (1998). 1999Smolen, supra at 296 ; Schellenberg v Rochester Michigan Lodge No 2225, 228 Mich App 20, 45 ; 577 NW2d 163 (1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Smolen v. Dahlmann Apartments, Ltd
green
2 sentences1999Smolen, supra at 296 ; Schellenberg v Rochester Michigan Lodge No 2225, 228 Mich App 20, 45 ; 577 NW2d 163 (1998). 1999Smolen, supra at 296 ; Schellenberg v Rochester Michigan Lodge No 2225, 228 Mich App 20, 45 ; 577 NW2d 163 (1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
King v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bowen v. Nelson Credit Centers, Inc
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Medbury v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bradley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Heath v. Alma Plastics Co.
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
In Re L'Esperance Estate
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Nelson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Butt v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C 1985See Burke v Angies, Inc, 143 Mich App 683 ; 373 NW2d 187 (1985); Johnston v Detroit Hoist & Crane Co, 142 Mich App 597 ; 370 NW2d 1 (1985); Nelson v DAIIE, 137 Mich App 226 ; 359 NW2d 536 (1984); Bowen v Nelson Credit Centers Inc, 137 Mich App 76 ; 357 NW2d 811 (1984); King v General Motors Corp, 136 Mich App 301 ; 356 NW2d 626 (1984); In re L’Esperance Estate, 131 Mich App 496 ; 346 NW2d 578 (1984); Bradley v DAIIE, 130 Mich App 34 ; 343 NW2d 506 (1983); Butt v DAIIE, 129 Mich App 211 ; 341 NW2d 474 (1983); Petterman v Haverhill, 125 Mich App 301 ; 335 NW2d 710 (1982); Heath v Alma Plastics C | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.