Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservationgreen2 sentences2007Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 266 (Miss.1990); see also Penrod Drilling Co. v. Bounds, 433 So.2d 916, 924-25 (Miss.1983) (Robertson, J., concurring). 2006Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So. 2d 263, 266 (Miss. 1990); see also Penrod Drilling Co. v. Bounds, 433 So. 2d 916, 924-25 (Miss. 1983) (Robertson, J., concurring). | 5 | 5 |
Singing River Mall Company v. Mark Fields, Inc.green2 sentences2001"In reviewing a subject matter jurisdiction challenge to the Constitution's grant of authority, the Supreme Court looks at the type of case by examining the nature of the controversy and the relief sought." Singing River Mall Co. v. Mark Fields, Inc., 599 So.2d 938, 942 (Miss.1992) .... the question is limited to whether Mississippi or federal law authorizes some other body to entertain this case, therefore, giving the trial court judge the authority to dismiss this case. 2000"In reviewing a subject matter jurisdiction challenge to the Constitution's grant of authority, the Supreme Court looks at the type of case by examining the nature of the controversy and the relief sought." Singing River Mall Co. v. Mark Fields, Inc., 599 So. 2d 938, 942 (Miss.1992). . . . the question is limited to whether Mississippi or federal law authorizes some other body to entertain this case, therefore, giving the trial court judge the authority to dismiss this case. | 5 | 5 |
Penrod Drilling Co. v. Boundsgreen2 sentences2007Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 266 (Miss.1990); see also Penrod Drilling Co. v. Bounds, 433 So.2d 916, 924-25 (Miss.1983) (Robertson, J., concurring). 2006Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So. 2d 263, 266 (Miss. 1990); see also Penrod Drilling Co. v. Bounds, 433 So. 2d 916, 924-25 (Miss. 1983) (Robertson, J., concurring). | 4 | 4 |
Carney v. Mooregreen2 sentences2016See Carney v. Moore, 130 Miss. 658 , 94 So. 890, 891 (1923); Humphreys v. McFarland, 48 So. 182 , 182 (Miss.1909). 2016See Carney v. Moore, 130 Miss. 658 , 94 So. 890, 891 (1923); Humphreys v. McFarland, 48 So. 182 , 182 (Miss.1909). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harrison v. Boyd Mississippi, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Harrison, 700 So.2d at 249 . 2000Harrison, 700 So. 2d at 249 . | 2 | 2000–2001 |
Hogrobrooks v. Progressive Direct
green
1 sentence2023“In reviewing a subject-matter jurisdiction challenge to the Constitution’s grant of authority, the Supreme Court looks at the type of case by examining the nature of the controversy and the relief sought.” Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.