exceptive assignment error (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

exceptive assignment error in North Carolina

11 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1942–1956 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Black green
nc · 1950
2 sentences

1951It does not bring up for review "the findings of fact or the evidence upon which they are based." Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 , 61 S.E.2d 705, 706 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; State of N. C. & City of Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 , 59 S.E.2d 621 ; Town of Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E.2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E.2d 502 .

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

21951–1951
Henderson County v. Johnson green
nc · 1949
2 sentences

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

21951–1951
Hoover v. Crotts green
nc · 1950
2 sentences

1951It does not bring up for review "the findings of fact or the evidence upon which they are based." Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 , 61 S.E.2d 705, 706 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; State of N. C. & City of Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 , 59 S.E.2d 621 ; Town of Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E.2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E.2d 502 .

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

21951–1951
Carter v. Carter green
nc · 1950
2 sentences

1951It does not bring up for review "the findings of fact or the evidence upon which they are based." Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 , 61 S.E.2d 705, 706 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; State of N. C. & City of Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 , 59 S.E.2d 621 ; Town of Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E.2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E.2d 502 .

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

21951–1951
Town of Burnsville v. Boone green
nc · 1950
2 sentences

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

1951It does not bring up for review “tbe findings of fact or tbe evidence upon wbicb they are based.” Hoover v. Crotts, 232 N.C. 617 ; Carter v. Carter, 232 N.C. 614 ; Greensboro v. Black, 232 N.C. 154 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 ; Henderson County v. Johnson, 230 N.C. 723 , 55 S.E. 2d 502 .

21951–1951
State v. . Gore green
nc · 1935
2 sentences

1943However, our Supreme Court has repeatedly held tbat tbe unsupported testimony of an accomplice, while it should be received with caution, if it produces convincing proof of tbe defendants’ guilt, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.” This excerpt is in accord with S. v. Gore, 207 N. C., 618 (620), 178 S. E., 209 , and tbe assignment of error is therefore untenable.

1943However, our Supreme Court has repeatedly held tbat tbe unsupported testimony of an accomplice, while it should be received with caution, if it produces convincing proof of tbe defendants’ guilt, is sufficient to sustain a conviction.” This excerpt is in accord with S. v. Gore, 207 N. C., 618 (620), 178 S. E., 209 , and tbe assignment of error is therefore untenable.

21943–1943
Hayes v. City of Wilmington green
nc · 1954
2 sentences

1956In cases such as Hayes v. City of Wilmington, 239 N.C. 238 , 79 S.E.2d 792 , where the only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the judgment in that the judgment is made to rest on an erroneous conclusion of law, it is well to read the judgment before stating that a substantial and material part of the opinion in the case is obiter dictum as is here done.

1956In cases such as Hayes v. City of Wilmington, 239 N.C. 238 , 79 S.E.2d 792 , where the only exceptive assignment of error is directed to alleged error in the judgment in that the judgment is made to rest on an erroneous conclusion of law, it is well to read the judgment before stating that a substantial and material part of the opinion in the case is obiter dictum as is here done.

11956–1956
Swink v. . Horn neutral
nc · 1946
2 sentences

1954Swink v. Horn, 226 N.C. 713 , 40 S.E. 2d 353 , and cases cited.

1954Swink v. Horn, 226 N.C. 713 , 40 S.E. 2d 353 , and cases cited.

11954–1954
Braddy v. . Pfaff neutral
nc · 1936
2 sentences

1950Braddy v. Pfaff, 210 N.C. 248 , 186 S.E. 340 ; In re Will of Hardee, 187 N.C. 381 , 121 S.E. 667 .

1950Braddy v. Pfaff, 210 N.C. 248 , 186 S.E. 340 ; In re Will of Hardee, 187 N.C. 381 , 121 S.E. 667 .

11950–1950
In Re Will of Hardee neutral
nc · 1924
2 sentences

1950Braddy v. Pfaff, 210 N.C. 248 , 186 S.E. 340 ; In re Will of Hardee, 187 N.C. 381 , 121 S.E. 667 .

1950Braddy v. Pfaff, 210 N.C. 248 , 186 S.E. 340 ; In re Will of Hardee, 187 N.C. 381 , 121 S.E. 667 .

11950–1950
State v. . Davis neutral
nc · 1942
2 sentences

1945Barnhill, J., in S. v. Davis, 222 N. C., 178 , 22 S. E. (2d), 274 , writes for tbe Court tbat a charge to tbe effect tbat an assault with a hoe would be an assault with a deadly weapon was in error, since such a charge assumes or bolds as a matter of law tbat a boe is per se a deadly weapon.

1945Barnhill, J., in S. v. Davis, 222 N. C., 178 , 22 S. E. (2d), 274 , writes for tbe Court tbat a charge to tbe effect tbat an assault with a hoe would be an assault with a deadly weapon was in error, since such a charge assumes or bolds as a matter of law tbat a boe is per se a deadly weapon.

11945–1945
Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. Williams green
nc · 1928
2 sentences

1945Even so, we discuss the assignment for the reason it is evident the court below was misled by the opinion in Goss v. Williams, 196 N. C., 213 , 145 S. E., 169 .

1945Even so, we discuss the assignment for the reason it is evident the court below was misled by the opinion in Goss v. Williams, 196 N. C., 213 , 145 S. E., 169 .

11945–1945
Knight v. . Little neutral
nc · 1940
2 sentences

1943Knight v. Little, 217 N. C., 681 , 9 S. E. (2d), 377 .

1943Knight v. Little, 217 N. C., 681 , 9 S. E. (2d), 377 .

11943–1943
State v. . Sinodis neutral
nc · 1925
2 sentences

1942S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565 , 127 S. E., 601 , and cases there cited.

1942S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565 , 127 S. E., 601 , and cases there cited.

11942–1942

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check