Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Department of Health v. Lutheran Hospitals & Homes Societygreen2 sentences1988As stated in Department of Health v. Lutheran Hosp. & Homes Soc., 227 Neb. 116, 117 , 416 N.W.2d 222, 223 (1987), a de novo review “does not mean that we ignore the findings of fact made by the board and the fact that it saw and heard the witnesses who appeared before the board at its hearing.” Appellant, in her brief, contends that the director could not have determined that an emergency existed and was attempting to deny appellant “the rights and procedures” granted by subsection (1) of § 71-1915. 1988As stated in Department of Health v. Lutheran Hosp. & Homes Soc., 227 Neb. 116, 117 , 416 N.W.2d 222, 223 (1987), a de novo review “does not mean that we ignore the findings of fact made by the board and the fact that it saw and heard the witnesses who appeared before the board at its hearing.” Appellant, in her brief, contends that the director could not have determined that an emergency existed and was attempting to deny appellant “the rights and procedures” granted by subsection (1) of § 71-1915. | 2 | 2 |
Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003)green2 sentences2020In re Application No. OP-0003, 303 Neb. 872 , 932 N.W.2d 653 (2019); In re Application No. C-4981, supra. Where the evidence is in conflict, the appellate court -3- will consider and may give weight to the fact that the agency hearing examiner observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than another. 2020In re Application No. OP-0003, 303 Neb. 872 , 932 N.W.2d 653 (2019); In re Application No. C-4981, supra. Where the evidence is in conflict, the appellate court -3- will consider and may give weight to the fact that the agency hearing examiner observed the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than another. | 1 | 5 |
Dieter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICESgreen2 sentences1997See Dieter v. State, 228 Neb. 368 , 422 N.W.2d 560 (1988) (review of administrative proceeding by Supreme Court de novo on record). 1997See Dieter v. State, 228 Neb. 368 , 422 N.W.2d 560 (1988) (review of administrative proceeding by Supreme Court de novo on record). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Claims Against Banghart Properties
neutral
1 sentence2023Id. - 176 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports IN RE CLAIMS AGAINST BANGHART PROPERTIES Cite as 32 Neb. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.