Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 New York opinions name it 3 courts 2020–2026 10 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bilitch v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.green2 sentences2026Corp ., 194 AD3d 999, 1001 (2d Dept 2021). 2022"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of [the Human Rights Law] must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 [2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 904 [2021]; see Bilitch v New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. , 194 AD3d 999, 1001 [2021]). | 4 | 4 |
Reichman v. City of New Yorkgreen2 sentences2025"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 ; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind , 3 NY3d 295, 312-313 ; Chiara v Town of New Castle , 126 AD3d 111, 119 ). 2022"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of [the Human Rights Law] must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 [2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 904 [2021]; see Bilitch v New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. , 194 AD3d 999, 1001 [2021]). | 3 | 5 |
Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the Blindgreen2 sentences2025"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 ; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind , 3 NY3d 295, 312-313 ; Chiara v Town of New Castle , 126 AD3d 111, 119 ). 2022"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 ; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind , 3 NY3d 295, 312-313 ). | 2 | 4 |
Lefort v. Kingsbrook Jewish Med. Ctr.green2 sentences2024Ctr. , 203 AD3d 708, 709-710 [2d Dept 2022]); see Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115 [2d Dept 2020]; Ayers v Bloomberg, L.P. , 203 AD3d 872 [2d Dept 2022]). 2024Ctr. , 203 AD3d 708, 709-710 [2d Dept 2022]); see Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115 [2d Dept 2020]; Ayers v Bloomberg, L.P. , 203 AD3d 872 [2d Dept 2022]). | 2 | 2 |
Ayers v. Bloomberg, L.P.green2 sentences2026"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Castro v City Univ. of N.Y. , 238 AD3d 1106 , 1107 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ayers v Bloomberg, L.P. , 203 AD3d 872, 874 ). 2024Ctr. , 203 AD3d 708, 709-710 [2d Dept 2022]); see Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115 [2d Dept 2020]; Ayers v Bloomberg, L.P. , 203 AD3d 872 [2d Dept 2022]). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Furfero v. St. John's University
green
2 sentences2021John's Univ. , 94 AD3d 695, 696 ). 2020John's Univ. , 94 AD3d 695, 696 ). | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Chiara v. Town of New Castle
green
1 sentence2025"A plaintiff alleging discrimination in violation of NYSHRL must establish that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was qualified to hold the position, (3) he or she suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" ( Reichman v City of New York , 179 AD3d 1115, 1116-1117 ; see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind , 3 NY3d 295, 312-313 ; Chiara v Town of New Castle , 126 AD3d 111, 119 ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.