existing evidentiary rule (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

existing evidentiary rule in Ohio

11 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Boczar, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005) neutral
ohioctapp · 2005
2 sentences

2013No. 2004-A-0063, 2005-Ohio-6910, ¶ 38 .

2013No. 2004-A-0063, 2005-Ohio-6910, ¶ 38 . {¶28} The delegation of authority to the director of health to establish the appropriate methods for determining the amount of alcohol in a defendant’s bodily substances does not conflict with any Rule of Evidence.

102013–2013
State v. O'Neill neutral
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014Portage No. 2012-P-0016, 2013-Ohio-2619, ¶¶ 16-17 . “ ‘ When a statute does not conflict with a Rule of Evidence, a statute can control the admissibility of evidence.’ ”O’Neil at ¶ 16, quoting State v. Cross, 11th Dist.

12014–2014
State v. Canino green
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014“In order to demonstrate [that] the legislature infringed upon the judiciary’s power to enact evidentiary rules[,] appellant must demonstrate [that] the legislation contradicts or is an attempt to supersede an existing evidentiary rule.” State v. Canino, 2013-Ohio-551 , 986 N.E.2d 1112 , ¶ 28 (11th Dist.); Lucarelli, 2013-Ohio-1606 at ¶ 31 ; State v. O’Neil, 11th Dist.

12014–2014
State v. Lucarelli green
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014“In order to demonstrate [that] the legislature infringed upon the judiciary’s power to enact evidentiary rules[,] appellant must demonstrate [that] the legislation contradicts or is an attempt to supersede an existing evidentiary rule.” State v. Canino, 2013-Ohio-551 , 986 N.E.2d 1112 , ¶ 28 (11th Dist.); Lucarelli, 2013-Ohio-1606 at ¶ 31 ; State v. O’Neil, 11th Dist.

12014–2014

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.19 (11) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2945.67 (6) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2317.47 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2907.02 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.51 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 4513.263 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 4511.21 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check