Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Payne v. Cartee
green
2 sentences2017Payne v. Cartee , 111 Ohio App.3d 580 , 590, 676 N.E.2d 946 , 952-953 (4th Dist.1996). 2017Payne v. Cartee , 111 Ohio App.3d 580 , 590, 676 N.E.2d 946 , 952-953 (4th Dist.1996). | 9 | 1998–2017 |
Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities Commission
green
2 sentences2012Comm., 129 Ohio St.3d 485 , 2011-Ohio-4189 , 954 N.E.2d 104 , ¶ 45. {¶ 34} “The decision of a trial court concerning the application of the doctrine of laches will not be reversed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. 2012Comm., 129 Ohio St.3d 485 , 2011-Ohio-4189 , 954 N.E.2d 104 , ¶ 45. {¶ 34} “The decision of a trial court concerning the application of the doctrine of laches will not be reversed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State Ex Rel. Donovan v. Zajac
green
2 sentences2002Zajac (1997), 125 Ohio App.3d 245 . {¶ 11} A trial court's decision concerning the application of the doctrine of laches will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. 2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |