timely objection error in Ohio

11 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
United States v. Vonngreen scotus · 2002 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021 2 sentences 2021Rule 52(b) normally requires the same kind of inquiry, with one important difference: It is the defendant rather than the Government who bears the burden of persuasion with respect to prejudice. * * * This burden shifting is dictated by a subtle but important difference in language between the two parts of Rule 52: While Rule 52(a) precludes error correction only if the error “does not affect substantial rights” (emphasis added), Rule 52(b) authorizes no remedy unless the error does “affec[t] substantial rights.” 12 January Term, 2021 (Brackets added in Olano.) United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 2021Rule 52(b) normally requires the same kind of inquiry, with one important difference: It is the defendant rather than the Government who bears the burden of persuasion with respect to prejudice. * * * This burden shifting is dictated by a subtle but important difference in language between the two parts of Rule 52: While Rule 52(a) precludes error correction only if the error “does not affect substantial rights” (emphasis added), Rule 52(b) authorizes no remedy unless the error does “affec[t] substantial rights.” 12 January Term, 2021 (Brackets added in Olano.) United States v. Olano, 507 U.S.	1	1
City of Hamilton v. Browngreen ohioctapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007See Boerst . {¶ 15} Appellee cites to Hamilton v. Brown (1981), 1 Ohio App.3d 165 , for the proposition that, when an accused "acts as his own attorney, is charged with a misdemeanor, and proceeds to trial without objection * * * the failure of the defendant to make a timely objection is a waiver" with regard to the Crim.R. 5 requirements.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Barnes green ohio · 2002 2 sentences 2017State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21, 27 , 759 N.E.2d 1240 (2002). 2017State v. Barnes, 94 Ohio St.3d 21, 27 , 759 N.E.2d 1240 (2002).	5	2012–2017
United States v. Olano green scotus · 1993 2 sentences 2021Rule 52(b) normally requires the same kind of inquiry, with one important difference: It is the defendant rather than the Government who bears the burden of persuasion with respect to prejudice. * * * This burden shifting is dictated by a subtle but important difference in language between the two parts of Rule 52: While Rule 52(a) precludes error correction only if the error “does not affect substantial rights” (emphasis added), Rule 52(b) authorizes no remedy unless the error does “affec[t] substantial rights.” 12 January Term, 2021 (Brackets added in Olano.) United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 2021Rule 52(b) normally requires the same kind of inquiry, with one important difference: It is the defendant rather than the Government who bears the burden of persuasion with respect to prejudice. * * * This burden shifting is dictated by a subtle but important difference in language between the two parts of Rule 52: While Rule 52(a) precludes error correction only if the error “does not affect substantial rights” (emphasis added), Rule 52(b) authorizes no remedy unless the error does “affec[t] substantial rights.” 12 January Term, 2021 (Brackets added in Olano.) United States v. Olano, 507 U.S.	1	2021–2021
State v. Payne green ohio · 2007 2 sentences 2009State v. Payne, 114 Ohio St.3d 502 , 2007-Ohio-4642 , 873 N.E.2d 306, ¶ 23 . 2009State v. Payne, 114 Ohio St.3d 502 , 2007-Ohio-4642 , 873 N.E.2d 306, ¶ 23 .	1	2009–2009
Schade v. Carnegie Body Co. green ohio · 1982 1 sentence 2006Civ.R. 51(A) and Schade v. Carnegie Body Co. (1982), 70 Ohio St. 2d 207 , paragraph one of the syllabus.	1	2006–2006
Strickland v. Washington green scotus · 1984 1 sentence 2005Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 .	1	2005–2005
State v. Riley, Unpublished Decision (9-15-2004) green ohioctapp · 2004 1 sentence 2005Id.	1	2005–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.01 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.03 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2925.11 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.14 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.24 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.13 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2929.20 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2945.75 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2923.01 (3) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2941.25 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 25 (1973–2025) CA 14 (1967–2016) IN 13 (1968–2010) PA 12 (1927–2020) AL 12 (1921–2013) OH 11 (2005–2021) MA 9 (1981–2025) DC 9 (1987–2023) NY 9 (1980–2015) MT 7 (2006–2016) WA 7 (1974–2025) MN 7 (1980–2016) FL 7 (1982–2025) IA 6 (1977–2021) IL 6 (1976–2023) WV 6 (1992–2015) MS 5 (2000–2013) AZ 5 (1968–2026) MD 4 (1993–2018) MI 4 (1982–2001) WI 4 (1978–2014) MO 4 (1989–2025) CO 3 (1993–2018) NC 3 (2000–2020) NH 2 (1982–1984) VA 2 (2005–2005) NM 2 (1994–2004) OR 2 (1990–2000) GA 2 (1990–1993) AR 2 (1989–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check