7 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Brown 9 The State may have contributed to this error by importing much of its answer brief in Moradi’s direct appeal into its response to his postconviction motion. 17 v. State, 124 So. 2d 481, 484 (Fla. 1960). 2019We held that, to overcome the timely objection rule and be deemed fundamental, “the error must reach down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.” Id. at 484 . | 1 | 2 |
Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Jacksongreen1 sentence1986Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Jackson, 433 So.2d 1319, 1322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Neil
green
2 sentences1991Fox made a timely objection to the challenge on the basis of State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1986), stating that the prospective juror, Mr. Williams, was one of only two prospective black jurors out of a panel of thirty. 1990State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). | 3 | 1989–1991 |
State v. Slappy
green
2 sentences1990State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). 1989State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). | 2 | 1989–1990 |
Andrews v. Adams
green
2 sentences1990State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). 1989State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). | 2 | 1989–1990 |
Galloway Farms, Inc. v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1990State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). 1989State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). | 2 | 1989–1990 |
State v. Castillo
green
1 sentence1991Fox made a timely objection to the challenge on the basis of State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1986), stating that the prospective juror, Mr. Williams, was one of only two prospective black jurors out of a panel of thirty. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Men's International Professional Tennis Council v. Volvo North America Corp.
green
1 sentence1990State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1984). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence1982On appeal, the District Court found that the instruction was erroneous but that the error had not been preserved because defendant had failed to state the grounds of his objection, and his motion for new trial did not assign the error sufficiently, holding ( 383 So.2d at 671 ): Defendant can only assert the error on appeal if he made a timely objection to the instruction or if the error is fundamental error. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.