Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burk v. K-Mart Corp.green2 sentences2002Id., 1989 OK 22 at 1 14, 770 P.2d at 28 . 110 After Burk, the Supreme Court continued to recognize the existence of the limited public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. 2002Id., 1989 OK 22 at 1 14, 770 P.2d at 28 . 110 After Burk, the Supreme Court continued to recognize the existence of the limited public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. | 1 | 9 |
Shero v. Grand Savings Bankgreen2 sentences2009But see, Shero v. Grand Savings Bank, 2007 OK 24, ¶ 13 , 161 P.3d 298 , which reached the opposite conclusion. 2009But see, Shero v. Grand Savings Bank, 2007 OK 24, ¶ 13 , 161 P.3d 298 , which reached the opposite conclusion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Groce v. Foster
green
2 sentences2009In 1994, we decided Groce v. Foster, 1994 OK 88 , ¶ 19, 880 P.2d 902 , in which we held that under the limited public policy exception, an employee could assert a Burk tort against a former employer when the employee was fired for not dismissing his common law negligence action against a third party who was a customer of the employer. 2009In 1994, we decided Groce v. Foster, 1994 OK 88 , ¶19, 880 P.2d 902 , in which we held that under the limited public policy exception, an employee could assert a Burk tort against a former employer when the employee was fired for not dismissing his common law negligence action against a third party who was a customer of the employer. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Prince v. St. John Medical Center
green
2 sentences1998John Medical Center, 1998 OK CIV APP 92 , 957 P.2d 563 (Citing and quoting Burk). 1998John Medical Center, 1998 OK CIV APP 92 , 957 P.2d 563 (Citing and quoting Burk). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.
green
2 sentences1989Liability is imposed on an employer only when "an employee is discharged for refusing to act in violation of an established and well-defined public policy or for performing an act consistent with a clear and compelling public policy." Id. at 29 . 1989Liability is imposed on an employer only when “an employee is discharged for refusing to act in violation of an established and well-defined public policy or for performing an act consistent with a clear and compelling public policy.” Id. at 29 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
McGehee v. Florafax International, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989McGehee v. Florafax Int'l, Inc., 776 P.2d 852 (Okla. 1989). 1989McGehee v. Florafax Int’l, Inc., 776 P.2d 852 (Okla.1989). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.