Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Warnergreen2 sentences2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). 2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). | 1 | 1 |
State v. O'Keygreen2 sentences2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). 2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. STATE, MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., ETC.
green
2 sentences1995ORS 813.100(3); Moore v. Motor Vehicles Division, 293 Or 715, 718 , 652 P2d 794 (1982). 1995ORS 813.100(3); Moore v. Motor Vehicles Division, 293 Or 715, 718 , 652 P2d 794 (1982). | 2 | 1993–1995 |
Pooler v. Motor Vehicles Division
green
2 sentences1994Pooler v. MVD, 306 Or 47, 51 , 755 P2d 701 (1988). 1989In Pooler , the Supreme Court stated: “Upon [the driver’s] request, the hearings officer was required under former ORS 482.541 to determine whether respondent validly was under arrest for DUII when asked to take the chemical breath test.” 3 306 Or at 51 . | 2 | 1989–1994 |
Murdoch v. DMV
green
1 sentence2021Columbia County Circuit Court 17CV49033; A169189 492 P3d 89 Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals a circuit court judgment reversing an administrative law judge’s affirmation of DMV’s decision to suspend petitioner’s driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical breath test. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Balderson
green
2 sentences2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). 2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Chipman
green
2 sentences2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). 2012See State v. Warner, 181 Or App 622, 634 , 47 P3d 497 , rev den, 335 Or 42 (2002) (using ORS 813.160(1) “to be valid” language as an example of a foundational requirement); State v. Chipman, 176 Or App 284, 294 , 31 P3d 478 (2001); State v. Balderson, 138 Or App 531 , 535 n 1, 910 P2d 1138 (1996); see also State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 293 , 899 P2d 663 (1995) (in the case of legislative recognition, there is no need for the court to determine scientific reliability). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Hays v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Division
green
2 sentences2010Hays v. DMV, 228 Or App 689 , 209 P3d 405 , modified on recons, 230 Or App 559 , 216 P3d 902 (2009). 2010Hays v. DMV, 228 Or App 689 , 209 P3d 405 , modified on recons, 230 Or App 559 , 216 P3d 902 (2009). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Hays v. DRIVER AND MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES
green
2 sentences2010Hays v. DMV, 228 Or App 689 , 209 P3d 405 , modified on recons, 230 Or App 559 , 216 P3d 902 (2009). 2010Hays v. DMV, 228 Or App 689 , 209 P3d 405 , modified on recons, 230 Or App 559 , 216 P3d 902 (2009). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Higgins v. Motor Vehicles Division
green
2 sentences2004We review the DMVs order for errors of law, ORS 813.450; Higgins v. MVD, 139 Or App 314, 317 , 911 P2d 950 (1996), and reverse and remand. 2004We review the DMVs order for errors of law, ORS 813.450; Higgins v. MVD, 139 Or App 314, 317 , 911 P2d 950 (1996), and reverse and remand. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Dooney v. Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences1999Similarly, in Dooney v. Dept. of Transportation, 305 Or 307, 309 , 751 P2d 790 (1988), decided on the same date as Atkinson , the court considered “the required contents of a valid notice of intention to suspend driving privileges” for refusal to take a chemical breath test. 1999Similarly, in Dooney v. Dept. of Transportation, 305 Or 307, 309 , 751 P2d 790 (1988), decided on the same date as Atkinson , the court considered “the required contents of a valid notice of intention to suspend driving privileges” for refusal to take a chemical breath test. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Warner v. Motor Vehicles Division
neutral
2 sentences1995We review MVD’s order for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 813.450(4); Warner v. MVD, 126 Or App 164, 166 , 868 P2d 6 (1994), and reverse. 1995We review MVD’s order for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 813.450(4); Warner v. MVD, 126 Or App 164, 166 , 868 P2d 6 (1994), and reverse. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Brinkley v. Motor Vehicles Division
green
2 sentences1988Brinkley v. Motor Vehicles Division, 47 Or App 25, 29 , 613 P2d 1071 (1980). 1988Brinkley v. Motor Vehicles Division, 47 Or App 25, 29 , 613 P2d 1071 (1980). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Ratliff
green
1 sentence1988The state argues that to allow inquiry into the validity of the arrest would unduly complicate the hearing, tax the adjudicative skills of the hearings officer, and implicate the collateral estoppel concerns at the heart of State v. Ratliff, supra. According to the state, the determination that respondent was “under arrest,” validly or not, ends the inquiry because respondent then could be requested to take the chemical breath test. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Heer v. Department of Motor Vehicles
green
2 sentences1988Heer v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 252 Or 455 , 450 P2d 533 (1969). 1988Heer v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 252 Or 455 , 450 P2d 533 (1969). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Freymuller
green
2 sentences1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). 1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Baxter
neutral
2 sentences1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). 1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Downing
neutral
2 sentences1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). 1982State v. Downing, 42 Or App 309 , 600 P2d 897 (1979); State v. Baxter, 34 Or App 963 , 580 P2d 203 (1978); State v. Freymuller, 26 Or App 411 , 552 P2d 867 (1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.