Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 2013–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Department of Human Services v. N. T.green2 sentences2022“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question—that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.” Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012). 2022“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question—that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.” Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012). | 4 | 11 |
Department of Human Services v. S. S.green2 sentences2017S., 267 Or App 301, 310 , 340 P3d 142 (2014), and the juvenile court must evaluate those efforts through the lens of the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question—that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). 2017K., 257 Or App 409, 418 , 306 P3d 763 (2013), with reference to the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question— that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Department of Human Services v. M. K.
green
2 sentences2017K., 257 Or App 409, 418 , 306 P3d 763 (2013), with reference to the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question— that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). 2017K., 257 Or App 409, 418 , 306 P3d 763 (2013), with reference to the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question— that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Department of Human Services v. T. S.
neutral
1 sentence2017S., 267 Or App 301, 310 , 340 P3d 142 (2014), and the juvenile court must evaluate those efforts through the lens of the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question—that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. R. J. H.
neutral
1 sentence2017S., 267 Or App 301, 310 , 340 P3d 142 (2014), and the juvenile court must evaluate those efforts through the lens of the “adjudicated bases for jurisdiction,” S. S., 278 Or App at 738 ; see also Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of each question—that is, both DHS’s efforts and a parent’s progress are evaluated by reference to the facts that formed the bases for juvenile court jurisdiction.”). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Department of Human Services v. D. L. H.
green
2 sentences2016H., 251 Or App 787, 799 , 284 P3d 1233 , modified on recons, 253 Or App 600 , 292 P3d 565 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 445 (2013), and, particularly, the adjudicated bases for jurisdiction, Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of [the sufficiency of DHS’s efforts.]”). 2016H., 251 Or App 787, 799 , 284 P3d 1233 , modified on recons, 253 Or App 600 , 292 P3d 565 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 445 (2013), and, particularly, the adjudicated bases for jurisdiction, Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of [the sufficiency of DHS’s efforts.]”). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Department of Human Services v. D. L. H.
green
2 sentences2016H., 251 Or App 787, 799 , 284 P3d 1233 , modified on recons, 253 Or App 600 , 292 P3d 565 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 445 (2013), and, particularly, the adjudicated bases for jurisdiction, Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of [the sufficiency of DHS’s efforts.]”). 2016H., 251 Or App 787, 799 , 284 P3d 1233 , modified on recons, 253 Or App 600 , 292 P3d 565 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 445 (2013), and, particularly, the adjudicated bases for jurisdiction, Dept. of Human Services v. N. T., 247 Or App 706, 715 , 271 P3d 143 (2012) (“The particular issues of parental unfitness established in the jurisdictional judgment provide the framework for the court’s analysis of [the sufficiency of DHS’s efforts.]”). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.