Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Crawfordgreen2 sentences2021See Crawford, 17 A.3d at 1281 (“Under the prisoner mailbox rule, we deem a document filed on the date it is placed in the hands of prison authorities for mailing”). 2020However, under the prison mailbox rule, courts “deem a pro se document filed on the date it is placed in the hands of prison authorities for mailing.” Commonwealth v. Crawford, 17 A.3d 1279, 1281 (Pa.Super. 2011). | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2021See Commonwealth v. Wilson, 911 A.2d 942, 944 (Pa.Super. 2006) (holding under the prison mailbox rule a pro se document is deemed filed on the date a prisoner deposits the document with the proper prison authority). 8 Although this pro se document was time-stamped January 4, 2021, we shall deem it to have been filed on December 27, 2020, when it was handed to prison authorities. 2021See Commonwealth v. Wilson, 911 A.2d 942, 944 (Pa.Super. 2006) (holding under the prison mailbox rule a pro se document is deemed filed on the date a prisoner deposits the document with the proper prison authority). -4- J-A16038-21 directed the PCRA court to enter a final determination with regard to Appellant’s August 17, 2020, petition. | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2017See Commonwealth v. Jones, 549 Pa. 58 , 700 A.2d 423 (1997) (holding the prison mailbox rule applies to all appeals by pro se prisoners). 2017See Commonwealth v. Jones, 549 Pa. 58 , 700 A.2d 423 (1997) (holding the prison mailbox rule applies to all appeals by pro se prisoners). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Burwellgreen1 sentence2024Commonwealth v. Burwell, 42 A.3d 1077, 1083 (Pa. Super. 2012) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Walker, T.green1 sentence2021See Wilson, supra. 9 We note that, in contravention of our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Walker, 646 Pa. 456 , 185 A.3d 969 (2018), Appellant (Footnote Continued Next Page) -7- J-S24039-21 On appeal, Appellant sets forth the following issue in his “Statement of Questions Involved” (verbatim): I. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Castrogreen1 sentence2021See Commonwealth v. Castro, 766 A.2d 1283, 1287 (Pa. Super. 2001) (filing focuses upon litigant’s placement of document in hands of appropriate officer; hence, Appellant’s envelope bearing postmark of December 27, 2019 demonstrated a timely filing). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Chambersgreen1 sentence2018See Commonwealth v. Chambers, 35 A.3d 34, 40 (Pa. Super. 2011), appeal denied, 46 A.3d 715 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Littlegreen1 sentence2015Under the prison mailbox rule, “appeals [are] deemed filed on the date that the prisoner deposits the appeal with prison authorities, or places it in a prison mailbox.” Commonwealth v. Little, 716 A.2d 1287, 1288 (Pa. Super. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.