Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 South Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Garritsen v. Leapleygreen2 sentences2000Wayrynen v. Class, 1998 SD 111, ¶ 17 , 586 N.W.2d 499, 502 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995)) (alterations in original) (citations omitted). 1996He must show that trial counsel made errors ‘so serious that counsel was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed ... by the Sixth Amendment.’ Secondly, he must show that the deficient performance ‘prejudiced the defense’ by showing that ‘counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.’ The reasonableness of trial counsel’s action is evaluated from his perspective at the time the alleged error occurred.” *78 Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995) (quoting Mitchell v. Class, 524 N.W.2d 860, 862 (S.D.1994)). [¶ 31] St. | 6 | 6 |
Mitchell v. Classgreen2 sentences2000Sund v. Weber, 1998 SD 123, ¶ 13 , 588 N.W.2d 223, 225 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995) (alterations in original) (quoting Mitchell v. Class, 524 N.W.2d 860, 862 (S.D.1994) (citations omitted))). 1996He must show that trial counsel made errors ‘so serious that counsel was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed ... by the Sixth Amendment.’ Secondly, he must show that the deficient performance ‘prejudiced the defense’ by showing that ‘counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.’ The reasonableness of trial counsel’s action is evaluated from his perspective at the time the alleged error occurred.” *78 Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995) (quoting Mitchell v. Class, 524 N.W.2d 860, 862 (S.D.1994)). [¶ 31] St. | 5 | 5 |
Sund v. Webergreen2 sentences2000Sund v. Weber, 1998 SD 123, ¶ 13 , 588 N.W.2d 223, 225 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995) (alterations in original) (quoting Mitchell v. Class, 524 N.W.2d 860, 862 (S.D.1994) (citations omitted))). 2000Sund v. Weber, 1998 SD 123, ¶ 13 , 588 N.W.2d 223, 225 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995) (alterations in original) (quoting Mitchell v. Class, 524 N.W.2d 860, 862 (S.D.1994) (citations omitted))). | 1 | 4 |
Wayrynen v. Classgreen2 sentences2000Wayrynen v. Class, 1998 SD 111, ¶ 17 , 586 N.W.2d 499, 502 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995)) (alterations in original) (citations omitted). 2000Wayrynen v. Class, 1998 SD 111, ¶ 17 , 586 N.W.2d 499, 502 (quoting Garritsen v. Leapley, 541 N.W.2d 89, 93 (S.D.1995)) (alterations in original) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Meinders v. Weber
green
2 sentences2000Meinders, 2000 SD 2, ¶ 42 , 604 N.W.2d at 264 (quoting Sund, 1998 SD 123, ¶ 13 , 588 N.W.2d at 225 )(alterations in original). 2000Meinders, 2000 SD 2, ¶ 42 , 604 N.W.2d at 264 (quoting Sund, 1998 SD 123, ¶ 13 , 588 N.W.2d at 225 )(alterations in original). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Luna v. Solem
green
2 sentences1995Id. 1994Id. | 2 | 1994–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.