11 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1986–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Younggreen2 sentences2006See Young, 181 S.W.3d at 528-29, 530 (trial court found that former “Article 28.061, in so far as it provided for dismissal with prejudice for Article 32.01 dismissals, constituted a violation of the constitutional separation of powers doctrine”). 2006See Young , 181 S.W.3d at 528-29, 530 (trial court found that former "Article 28.061, in so far as it provided for dismissal with prejudice for Article 32.01 dismissals, constituted a violation of the constitutional separation of powers doctrine"). | 2 | 2 |
Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Boardgreen2 sentences2003See Tex. Ass'n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 444 (citing Valley Forge Christian College in support of the following statement: "One limit on courts' jurisdiction under both the state and federal constitutions is the separation of powers doctrine."). 2003See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 444 (citing Valley Forge Christian College in support of the following statement: “One limit on courts’ jurisdiction under both the state and federal constitutions is the separation of powers doctrine.”). | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Grovesgreen1 sentence2015ARGUMENT Pretrial cognizability of “as-applied” constitutional challenges to statutes “Habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy; and, ordinarily, neither a trial court nor this Court, either in the exercise of [its] original or appellate jurisdiction, should entertain an application for writ of habeas corpus where there is an adequate remedy at law.” Ex parte Groves, 571 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. County of El Pasogreen1 sentence2007See id. at 1034 . | 1 | 1 |
Heyn v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.green1 sentence2004Id. at 262, 264-66 . | 1 | 1 |
Environmental Protection Agency v. Minkred1 sentence1986See generally, Environmental Protection Agency v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Meshell v. State
green
2 sentences2006This provision was unconstitutional under the same analysis utilized in Meshell v. State, 739 S.W.2d 246 (Tex.Crim.App.1987). 2005This provision was unconstitutional under the same analysis utilized in Meshell v. State, 739 S.W.2d 246 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 2005–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.