details of the PRA violation (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

details of the PRA violation in Washington

11 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2026 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Pasco Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Pascogreen
wash · 1997 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014
2 sentences

2014See Pasco Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Pasco, 132 Wn.2d 450, 469 , 938 P.2d 827 (1997) (noting that "[w]hether a party has failed to negotiate in good faith, although involving a substantial factual component, is a mixed question of law and fact."); Tapper v. Emp't Sec.

2013See Pasco Police Officers’ Ass’n v. City of Pasco, 132 Wn.2d 450, 469 , 938 P.2d 827 (1997) (noting that “[w]hether a party has failed to negotiate in good faith, although involving a substantial factual component, is a mixed question of law and fact”); Tapper v. Emp’t Sec.

33
PASCO POLICE OFFICERS'ASS'N v. City of Pascogreen
wash · 1997 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014
2 sentences

2014See Pasco Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Pasco, 132 Wn.2d 450, 469 , 938 P.2d 827 (1997) (noting that "[w]hether a party has failed to negotiate in good faith, although involving a substantial factual component, is a mixed question of law and fact."); Tapper v. Emp't Sec.

2013See Pasco Police Officers’ Ass’n v. City of Pasco, 132 Wn.2d 450, 469 , 938 P.2d 827 (1997) (noting that “[w]hether a party has failed to negotiate in good faith, although involving a substantial factual component, is a mixed question of law and fact”); Tapper v. Emp’t Sec.

33
Faulkner v. Department of Correctionsgreen
washctapp · 2014 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2026
2 sentences

2026Faulkner v. Dep’t of Corr., 183 Wn.

2015One acting wantonly may be creating no greater risk of harm, but he is not trying to avoid it and is indifferent to whether harm results or not.” Id. at 103-04 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary, supra, at 1720). ¶31 “Whether an agency acted in bad faith under the PRA presents a mixed question of law and fact, in that it requires the application of legal precepts (the definition of ‘bad faith’) to factual circumstances (the details of the PRA violation).” Francis, 178 Wn.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Francis v. Department of Corrections green
washctapp · 2013
2 sentences

2026When Haugen sent Gray the second installment of documents, he explained to Gray that building inspections were only conducted every three years, and annual reports were backlogged because of staffing shortages and disruption related to the COVID 3 “Whether an agency acted in bad faith under the PRA presents a mixed question of law and fact, in that it requires the application of legal precepts (the definition of ‘bad faith’) to factual circumstances (the details of the PRA violation).” Francis v. Dep't of Corr., 178 Wn.

2024“Whether an agency acted in bad faith under the PRA presents a mixed question of law and fact, in that it requires the application of legal precepts (the definition of ‘bad faith’) to factual circumstances (the details of the PRA violation).” Francis v. Dep’t of Corr., 178 Wn.

72014–2026

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.550 (9) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.565 (8) USC § 5u.s.c.552 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.030 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.070 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 42.56.100 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check