Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baldrige v. Shapirogreen2 sentences2018Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 843 , 935 P.2d 611 (1997); see also Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S. Ct. 1103 , 71 L. 2018Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 843 , 935 P.2d 611 (1997); see also Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S. Ct. 1103 , 71 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Hodge And Zweiggreen1 sentence1984As a general rule, "the identity of an attorney's clients and the nature of his fee arrangements with his clients are not confidential communications protected by the attorney-client privilege." United States v. Hodge & Zweig, 548 F.2d 1347, 1353 (9th Cir. 1977). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Seventh Elect Church v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2003Cf. Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. Rogers, 102 Wn.2d 527, 534 , 688 P.2d 506 (1984) (the ethics rule of attorney-client confidentiality is a higher standard than the statutory attorney-client privilege). 2003Cf. Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. Rogers, 102 Wn.2d 527, 534 , 688 P.2d 506 (1984) (the ethics rule of attorney-client confidentiality is a higher standard than the statutory attorney-client privilege). | 5 | 1988–2003 |
In re the Detention of Williams
green
2 sentences2018"Confidence' refers to information protected by the attorney client privilege under applicable law, and 'secret' refers to other information gained in the professional 12 In Matter of Det. of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476,494 , 55 P.3d 597 (2002)(a client "cannot create a privilege simply by giving [crime related] records to his attorney."). 6 Nos. 75722-9-1 & 75828-4-1/7 relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client."13 "Confidences," for purposes of RPC 1.6, is coextensive with the st 2018"Confidence' refers to information protected by the attorney client privilege under applicable law, and 'secret' refers to other information gained in the professional 12 In Matter of Det. of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476, 494 , 55 P.3d 597 (2002)(a client "cannot create a privilege simply by giving [crime related] records to his attorney."). 6 Nos. 75722-9-1 & 75828-4-1/7 relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client."13 "Confidences," for purposes of RPC 1.6, is coextensive with the s | 2 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Detention of Williams
green
2 sentences2018"Confidence' refers to information protected by the attorney client privilege under applicable law, and 'secret' refers to other information gained in the professional 12 In Matter of Det. of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476,494 , 55 P.3d 597 (2002)(a client "cannot create a privilege simply by giving [crime related] records to his attorney."). 6 Nos. 75722-9-1 & 75828-4-1/7 relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client."13 "Confidences," for purposes of RPC 1.6, is coextensive with the st 2018"Confidence' refers to information protected by the attorney client privilege under applicable law, and 'secret' refers to other information gained in the professional 12 In Matter of Det. of Williams, 147 Wn.2d 476, 494 , 55 P.3d 597 (2002)(a client "cannot create a privilege simply by giving [crime related] records to his attorney."). 6 Nos. 75722-9-1 & 75828-4-1/7 relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client."13 "Confidences," for purposes of RPC 1.6, is coextensive with the s | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Cory
green
2 sentences2010Id. ¶ 33 The court then turned to the issue of remedy. 2010Id. ¶33 The court then turned to the issue of remedy. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Dietz v. Doe
green
2 sentences1997Thus, when we resolve the statutory attorney-client privilege question, we also resolve the RPC 1.6 issue. [4] The Court of Appeals described the record in this case as "barely adequate." Dietz, 80 Wash. App. at 793 , 911 P.2d 1025 . 1997Thus, when we resolve the statutory attorney-client privilege question, we also resolve the RPC 1.6 issue. [4] The Court of Appeals described the record in this case as "barely adequate." Dietz, 80 Wash. App. at 793 , 911 P.2d 1025 . | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Dietz v. Doe
green
1 sentence2018Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 843 , 935 P.2d 611 (1997); see also Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S. Ct. 1103 , 71 L. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Dietz v. Doe
green
1 sentence2018Dietz v. Doe, 131 Wn.2d 835, 843 , 935 P.2d 611 (1997); see also Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S. Ct. 1103 , 71 L. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Krogh
green
2 sentences2003“Lawyers are held to higher standards of moral conduct than are other citizens.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Krogh, 85 Wn.2d 462, 488 , 536 P.2d 578 (1975). 2003“Lawyers are held to higher standards of moral conduct than are other citizens.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Krogh, 85 Wn.2d 462, 488 , 536 P.2d 578 (1975). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.