jury could consider violation (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

jury could consider violation in Arizona

10 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Carreongreen
ariz · 2005 · cited in 10 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2007–2012
2 sentences

2012This Court rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 (2005). 4.

2012This Court rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 (2005). 4.

810

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Hampton v. United States neutral
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2009We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). 4.

2007We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). ¶ 89 (6) The death penalty is cruel and unusual under any circumstances and violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and Article 2, Section 15 of the Arizona Constitution.

22007–2009
Garcia v. Illinois Department of Children & Family Services green
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2009We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). 4.

2007We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). ¶ 89 (6) The death penalty is cruel and unusual under any circumstances and violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and Article 2, Section 15 of the Arizona Constitution.

22007–2009
Najmehchi v. United States green
scotus · 2005
2 sentences

2009We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). 4.

2007We rejected this argument in State v. Carreon, 210 Ariz. 54 , 70-71 ¶¶ 81-87, 107 P.3d 900, 916-17 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 854 , 126 S.Ct. 122 , 163 L.Ed.2d 129 (2005). ¶ 89 (6) The death penalty is cruel and unusual under any circumstances and violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and Article 2, Section 15 of the Arizona Constitution.

22007–2009

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4031 (8) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-751 (6) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-756 (4) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-703 (3) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-752 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

AZ 10 (2007–2012) FL 3 (1981–2003) CA 2 (2020–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check