10 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1960–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.green2 sentences2020See Butler v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc., 243 Conn. 454 , 463– 64, 704 A.2d 222 (1997) (individual was ‘‘an employer,’’ as defined by General Statutes § 31-71a (1), and, there- fore, could be liable under General Statutes § 31-72 for unpaid overtime wages, ‘‘if the individual is the ultimate responsible authority to set the hours of employment and to pay wages and is the specific cause of the wage violation’’). 2020See Butler v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc., 243 Conn. 454 , 463– 64, 704 A.2d 222 (1997) (individual was ‘‘an employer,’’ as defined by General Statutes § 31-71a (1), and, there- fore, could be liable under General Statutes § 31-72 for unpaid overtime wages, ‘‘if the individual is the ultimate responsible authority to set the hours of employment and to pay wages and is the specific cause of the wage violation’’). | 1 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. Tiger Claw, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 124, 61 A.3d 533 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
General Electric Company v. New York State Department Of Labor
green
1 sentence1997See Associated Builders Contractors v. Perry, supra, 869 F. Sup. 1244 -45 (holding that administrative burdens imposed by the state prevailing wage law, e.g. requiring new calculations of payments to employee benefit plans on an hourly basis, rather than monthly or annual, and the submission of the fringe benefit plan in writing if the employer was to receive credit toward the prevailing wage rate, related to the administration of ERISA plans and thus mandated preemption); Associated Builders Contractors v. Baca, supra, 769 F. Sup. 1547 (holding state law was preempted by ERISA because "the wa | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Koshland v. Helvering
green
2 sentences1960Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441, 446 , 56 S. Ct. 767 , 80 L. 1960Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441, 446 , 56 S. Ct. 767 , 80 L. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.