9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. Steelegreen2 sentences2011Rather, the wage claim is submitted to the Indiana Department of Labor." Id. at 705 . 2009Vincent Hosp. & Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Steele, 766 N.E.2d 699, 705 (Ind.2002); see also Naugle v. Beech Grove City Schs., 864 N.E.2d 1058 , 1061 n. 1 (Ind.2007) (observing that, while Wage Payment Act claimants may proceed by filing a complaint, "the Wage Claims Statute requires that a wage claim be submitted to the [DOL] for administrative enforcement" and holding that, "[blecause no administrative proceedings have been pursued, the plaintiffs' contentions under the Wage Claims Act are not before us") (emphasis added) 3 Instead, the claim is submitted to the DOL. | 2 | 5 |
Naugle v. Beech Grove City Schoolsgreen2 sentences2018Id. at 705 (emphasis added).17 [30] And in Naugle v. Beech Grove City Schools, 864 N.E.2d 1058, 1062 (Ind. 2007), the court held that although claimants under the Wage Payment Statute may proceed by filing a complaint, “the Wage Claims Statute requires that a wage claim be submitted to the Department of Labor for administrative enforcement.” Yet again, in Quimby v. Becovic Management Group., Inc., 962 N.E.2d 1199, 1200 (Ind. 2012), the court held that “an employee who has a claim under the Wage Claims Statute must first exhaust an administrative remedy with the DOL before filing a lawsuit.” (c 2009Vincent Hosp. & Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Steele, 766 N.E.2d 699, 705 (Ind.2002); see also Naugle v. Beech Grove City Schs., 864 N.E.2d 1058 , 1061 n. 1 (Ind.2007) (observing that, while Wage Payment Act claimants may proceed by filing a complaint, "the Wage Claims Statute requires that a wage claim be submitted to the [DOL] for administrative enforcement" and holding that, "[blecause no administrative proceedings have been pursued, the plaintiffs' contentions under the Wage Claims Act are not before us") (emphasis added) 3 Instead, the claim is submitted to the DOL. | 2 | 4 |
Quimby v. Becovic Management Group, Inc.green1 sentence2018Id. at 705 (emphasis added).17 [30] And in Naugle v. Beech Grove City Schools, 864 N.E.2d 1058, 1062 (Ind. 2007), the court held that although claimants under the Wage Payment Statute may proceed by filing a complaint, “the Wage Claims Statute requires that a wage claim be submitted to the Department of Labor for administrative enforcement.” Yet again, in Quimby v. Becovic Management Group., Inc., 962 N.E.2d 1199, 1200 (Ind. 2012), the court held that “an employee who has a claim under the Wage Claims Statute must first exhaust an administrative remedy with the DOL before filing a lawsuit.” (c | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
MacLeod v. Guardianship of Hunter
green
2 sentences2011Island insists otherwise, pointing to this court’s decision in MacLeod v. Guardianship of Hunter, 671 N.E.2d 177 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), trans. denied, which held in part that Trial Rule 75(A)(8) “adopts special venue statutes into the regulatory scheme of T.R. 75.” Id. at 179 . 2011Island insists otherwise, pointing to this court’s decision in MacLeod v. Guardianship of Hunter, 671 N.E.2d 177 (Ind.Ct.App.1996), trans. denied, which held in part that Trial Rule 75(A)(8) “adopts special venue statutes into the regulatory scheme of T.R. 75.” Id. at 179 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Indiana Department of Labor v. Richard
green
1 sentence2001A panel of this court held that the statute did not apply because the wage claim was made after the employee had been terminated from employment. 732 N.E.2d at 813 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.