Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rose v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2016A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.”). 13 See Rose v. United States, 629 A.2d 526, 536-37 (D.C. 1993) (“Where counsel has made no attempt to address the issue, we will not remedy the defect, especially where important questions of far-reaching significance are involved. . . . 2016A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.”). 13 See Rose v. United States, 629 A.2d 526, 536-37 (D.C. 1993) (“Where counsel has made no attempt to address the issue, we will not remedy the defect, especially where important questions of far-reaching significance are involved. . . . | 2 | 2 |
In Re WETgreen2 sentences2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. 2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. | 2 | 2 |
Williams v. Gerstenfeldgreen2 sentences2008"A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.” Id. 2001“A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.” Williams, 514 A.2d at 1177 . | 1 | 3 |
Comford v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2009A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.” 4 Linen v. Lanford, 945 A.2d 1173 , 1180 n. 4 (D.C.2008) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). “[0]b-jections must be made with reasonable specificity; the [trial] judge must be fairly apprised as to the question on which he is being asked to rule.” Comford v. United States, 947 A.2d 1181, 1186 (D.C.2008) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Goldfarb v. Marchionnegreen2 sentences2007See, e.g., Goldfarb v. Marchionne, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 933 , 425 N.E.2d 401, 402 (1981) (refusing specific performance of contract for purchase of real estate because the parties deliberately misstated the price in the contract in order to mislead the taxing authorities). 2007See, e.g., Goldfarb v. Marchionne, 12 Mass.App.Ct. 933 , 425 N.E.2d 401, 402 (1981) (refusing specific performance of contract for purchase of real estate because the parties deliberately misstated the price in the contract in order to mislead the taxing authorities). | 1 | 1 |
Application of LLgreen2 sentences2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. 2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re PS
green
2 sentences2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. 2007A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record."). [13] See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478; In re Petition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Linen v. Lanford
green
1 sentence2009A court deviates from this principle only in exceptional situations and when necessary to prevent a clear miscarriage of justice apparent from the record.” 4 Linen v. Lanford, 945 A.2d 1173 , 1180 n. 4 (D.C.2008) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). “[0]b-jections must be made with reasonable specificity; the [trial] judge must be fairly apprised as to the question on which he is being asked to rule.” Comford v. United States, 947 A.2d 1181, 1186 (D.C.2008) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re SCM
green
1 sentence2007See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478 ; In repetition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Cianela v. Department of Public Welfare
green
1 sentence2007See In re W.E.T., supra, 793 A.2d at 478 ; In repetition of P.S., supra, 797 A.2d 1219 ; In re L.L., supra, 653 A.2d at 881 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
In the Matter of Jesse Gene Elmore
green
2 sentences1986Miller v. Avirom, supra, 127 U.S.App.D.C. at 371 , 384 F.2d at 322-23 ; In re Elmore, 127 U.S. App. D.C. 176 , 382 F.2d 125 (1967). 1986Miller v. Avirom, supra, 127 U.S.App.D.C. at 371 , 384 F.2d at 322-23 ; In re Elmore, 127 U.S. App. D.C. 176 , 382 F.2d 125 (1967). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson Avirom
green
2 sentences1986Miller v. Avirom, supra, 127 U.S.App.D.C. at 371 , 384 F.2d at 322-23 ; In re Elmore, 127 U.S. App. D.C. 176 , 382 F.2d 125 (1967). 1986Miller v. Avirom, supra, 127 U.S.App.D.C. at 371 , 384 F.2d at 322-23 ; In re Elmore, 127 U.S. App. D.C. 176 , 382 F.2d 125 (1967). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.