claimant presents claim (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

claimant presents claim in Florida

10 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Cunningham v. Florida Department of Children & Familiesgreen
fladistctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014
2 sentences

2014According to section 768.28(6)(a): An action may not be instituted on a claim against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions unless the claimant presents the claim in writing to the appropriate agency, and also, except as to any claim against a municipality or the Florida Space Authority, presents such claim in writing to the Department of Financial Services, within 3 years after such claim accrues and the Department of Financial Services or the appropriate agency denies the claim in writing The notice requirement is a condition precedent to maintaining an action. § 768.28(6)(b). “[T

2013The notice requirements “are conditions precedent to maintaining an action.... ” Id. at § 768.28(6)(b). “[T]he purpose of the notice requirement is to provide the State and its agencies sufficient notice of claims filed against them and time to investigate and respond to those claims.” Cunningham v. Florida Dept, of Children and Families, 782 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (citing Metro.

22
Levine v. Dade County School Bd.green
fla · 1983 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2005–2022
2 sentences

2022Further, because section 768.28(6) is part of a statutory waiver of sovereign immunity, “it must be strictly construed.” Levine, 442 So. 2d at 212 ; Menendez v. North Broward Hosp.

2005Bd., 442 So.2d 210, 212 (Fla.1983) (holding that under section 768.28 a plaintiff may not maintain an action against a state agency unless he presents written notice of a claim to the DOI despite the DOI having “no interest or role in the proceedings other than to report claims to the legislature.”).

12
Menendez v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.green
fla · 1988 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Dist., 537 So. 2d 89, 90 (Fla. 1988) (“Under section 768.28(6), not only must the notice be given before a suit may be maintained, but also the complaint must contain an allegation of such notice.”) See also § 768.28(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing in part: “An officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any of its subdivisions may not be held personally liable in tort or named as a party defendant in any action for any injury or damage suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission of action in the scope of her or his employment or function, unless such officer, employee, or agent

11
Preudhomme v. Baileygreen
fladistctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Dist., 537 So. 2d 89, 90 (Fla. 1988) (“Under section 768.28(6), not only must the notice be given before a suit may be maintained, but also the complaint must contain an allegation of such notice.”) See also § 768.28(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing in part: “An officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any of its subdivisions may not be held personally liable in tort or named as a party defendant in any action for any injury or damage suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission of action in the scope of her or his employment or function, unless such officer, employee, or agent

11
Aitcheson v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehiclesgreen
fladistctapp · 2013 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014According to section 768.28(6)(a): An action may not be instituted on a claim against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions unless the claimant presents the claim in writing to the appropriate agency, and also, except as to any claim against a municipality or the Florida Space Authority, presents such claim in writing to the Department of Financial Services, within 3 years after such claim accrues and the Department of Financial Services or the appropriate agency denies the claim in writing The notice requirement is a condition precedent to maintaining an action. § 768.28(6)(b). “[T

11
Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.green
fla · 1979 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008See Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010, 1015-16 (Fla.1979). [3] Although not legally determinative, it appears that Ms. Lederer also believed that the OUC was a municipal agency, and not a municipal department, as argued on appeal, since she filed the instant lawsuit only against the OUC and not the City.

11
Wall v. Palm Beach Countygreen
fladistctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001See Wall v. Palm Beach County, 743 So.2d 44, 44-45 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Pearlstein v. Malunney green
fladistctapp · 1986
1 sentence

1989Pearlstein I states "we cannot authorize revival of the complaint because, as petitioners point out, it fails to satisfy the statutory notice requirements of section 768.495, Florida Statutes (1985) and is subject to timely challenge on these grounds." 500 So.2d at 587 .

11989–1989
Berger v. Jackson green
fla · 1945
2 sentences

1988Soldovere relies on Berger v. Jackson, 156 Fla. 251 , 23 So.2d 265 (1945), which held that when a cause of action accrues after the death of the person against whom it lies the limitation period does not begin to run until there is a grant of administration of the estate, i.e., there is someone capable of being sued.

1988Soldovere relies on Berger v. Jackson, 156 Fla. 251 , 23 So.2d 265 (1945), which held that when a cause of action accrues after the death of the person against whom it lies the limitation period does not begin to run until there is a grant of administration of the estate, i.e., there is someone capable of being sued.

11988–1988
Keith v. Dykes neutral
fladistctapp · 1983
1 sentence

1986In Soldovere I, the court also held that the trial court was bound to follow Keith v. Dykes, 430 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), which holds that a cause of action does not accrue until the claimant presents the claim in writing and the affected agency denies or is deemed to have denied the claim in writing pursuant to section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1981).

11986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 768.28 (10)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 10 (1986–2024) WA 2 (1997–1997) CT 2 (1992–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check