just compensation clause (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

just compensation clause in Florida

10 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1964–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angelesgreen
scotus · 1987 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1990–1998
2 sentences

1998See 482 U.S. at 318 , 107 S.Ct. at 2388 .

1998See 482 U.S. at 318 , 107 S.Ct. at 2388 .

12
Department of Transp. v. Weisenfeldgreen
fladistctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995
1 sentence

1995In the first case, the government action is simply invalid; in the second case, the government action is invalid absent compensation, and so government may either abandon its regulation or validate its action by payment of appropriate compensation, i.e., by exercising its power of eminent domain." Id. at 57 (quoting Department of Transportation v. Weisenfeld, 617 So.2d 1071, 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (Griffin, J., concurring) quoting P. Wiseman, When the End Justifies the Means: Understanding Takings Jurisprudence In a Legal System With Integrity, 63 St.

11
Board of Com'rs of State Inst. v. TALLAHASSEE B. & T. CO.green
fladistctapp · 1958 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See Board of Comm'rs v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., 108 So.2d 74, 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958) (it would be "totally unjust" to permit the state to rely on ordinances restricting land use as evidence of depressed land values in effort to reduce amount of just compensation awarded in eminent domain proceeding), writ quashed, 116 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1959). [13] Recently, the Eleventh Circuit has suggested that a just compensation claim is unavailable if a landowner seeks to invalidate a regulation.

11
Board of Com'rs of State Inst. v. Tallahassee B. & T. Co.green
fla · 1959 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See Board of Comm'rs v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., 108 So.2d 74, 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958) (it would be "totally unjust" to permit the state to rely on ordinances restricting land use as evidence of depressed land values in effort to reduce amount of just compensation awarded in eminent domain proceeding), writ quashed, 116 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1959). [13] Recently, the Eleventh Circuit has suggested that a just compensation claim is unavailable if a landowner seeks to invalidate a regulation.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United States green
scotus · 1893
2 sentences

1971But when he appropriately invokes the just compensation clause, he is entitled to a judicial determination of the amount.” And in Monongahela Navigation Co. v. U.S., supra, 148 U.S.312, 13 S.Ct. 622 , 37 L.Ed. 463 , in which the Supreme Court struck down an Act of Congress purporting to exclude an element of value [the franchise to collect tolls] in the purchase of the lock and dam of the Navigation Company, the court said that just compensation means that “a full and perfect equivalent for the property taken” must be returned to the owner, and that “By this legislation congress seems to have

1971But when he appropriately invokes the just compensation clause, he is entitled to a judicial determination of the amount.” And in Monongahela Navigation Co. v. U.S., supra, 148 U.S.312, 13 S.Ct. 622 , 37 L.Ed. 463 , in which the Supreme Court struck down an Act of Congress purporting to exclude an element of value [the franchise to collect tolls] in the purchase of the lock and dam of the Navigation Company, the court said that just compensation means that “a full and perfect equivalent for the property taken” must be returned to the owner, and that “By this legislation congress seems to have

41964–2019
Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway v. AGWS green
fla · 1994
2 sentences

1996In A.G.W.S., supra, the court said at 57, "... government may so intrusively regulate the use of property in pursuit of legitimate police power objectives as to take the property without compensation, in violation of the just compensation clause. "`[t]he government action is invalid absent compensation, and so government may either abandon its regulation or validate its action by payment of appropriate compensation, i.e., by exercising its power of eminent domain." During World War II private property was appropriated by the United States.

1995In the first case, the government action is simply invalid; in the second case, the government action is invalid absent compensation, and so government may either abandon its regulation or validate its action by payment of appropriate compensation, i.e., by exercising its power of eminent domain." Id. at 57 (quoting Department of Transportation v. Weisenfeld, 617 So.2d 1071, 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (Griffin, J., concurring) quoting P. Wiseman, When the End Justifies the Means: Understanding Takings Jurisprudence In a Legal System With Integrity, 63 St.

21995–1996
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States green
scotus · 1936
2 sentences

1971Co. v. U.S., supra, 298 U.S. 349 , 56 S. Ct. 797 , 80 L.Ed. at p. 1224 : “The just compensation clause may not be evaded or impaired by any form of legislation.

1971Co. v. U.S., supra, 298 U.S. 349 , 56 S. Ct. 797 , 80 L.Ed. at p. 1224 : “The just compensation clause may not be evaded or impaired by any form of legislation.

21964–1971
United States v. Bodcaw Co. green
scotus · 1979
2 sentences

1998U.S. v. Bodcaw Co., 440 U.S. 202, 203 , 99 S.Ct. 1066 , 59 L.Ed.2d 257 (1979).

1998U.S. v. Bodcaw Co., 440 U.S. 202, 203 , 99 S.Ct. 1066 , 59 L.Ed.2d 257 (1979).

11998–1998
Richard Reahard Ann P. Reahard v. Lee County green
ca11 · 1992
1 sentence

1992"Just compensation claims admit and assume that the subject regulation substantially advances a legitimate government interest; the validity of the regulation is not at issue." Reahard v. Lee County, 968 F.2d 1131 (11th Cir.1992).

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

CA 37 (1976–2025) WI 10 (1983–2026) FL 10 (1964–2019) TX 8 (1940–2019) WA 8 (1976–2006) RI 5 (1980–2003) CO 5 (1979–1995) VA 4 (1989–2013) ID 4 (1988–2018) MA 4 (2004–2024) OR 3 (2017–2024) UT 3 (1990–2017) NH 3 (1981–2005) IL 3 (1982–2003) GA 3 (1993–2025) AZ 3 (1978–1991) IN 2 (2005–2013) ME 2 (2007–2023) MD 2 (1986–2019) NY 2 (1926–2005) NM 2 (2006–2006) AK 2 (1980–2009) MI 2 (1976–2017) CT 2 (1998–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check