8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1940–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hallco Texas, Inc. v. McMullen Countygreen2 sentences2009See Hallco Tex., Inc. v. McMullen County , 221 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Tex. 2006); Sheffield , 140 S.W.3d at 669 . 2009See Hallco Tex., Inc. v. McMullen County, 221 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Tex.2006); Sheffield, 140 S.W.3d at 669 . | 4 | 4 |
June Roth v. Nathan Pritikin and Patrick M. McGrady Jr.green1 sentence2019See id. (citing Loretto and PruneYard). | 1 | 1 |
City of Sherman v. Waynegreen1 sentence2010“Although the Texas constitution’s adequate compensation provision is worded differently than the just compensation clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Texas Supreme Court has described them as comparable and generally looks to federal cases for guidance in takings cases.” City of Sherman v. Wayne, 266 S.W.3d 34, 42-43 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.) (citing Sheffield, 140 S.W.3d at 669). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
SHEFFIELD DEVEL. CO. INC. v. City of Glenn Heights
green
2 sentences2009See Hallco Tex., Inc. v. McMullen County , 221 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Tex. 2006); Sheffield , 140 S.W.3d at 669 . 2009See Hallco Tex., Inc. v. McMullen County, 221 S.W.3d 50, 56 (Tex.2006); Sheffield, 140 S.W.3d at 669 . | 4 | 2008–2009 |
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago
green
2 sentences1986Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, 236 , 17 S.Ct. 581, 584 , 41 L.Ed. 979 (1897). 1986Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226, 236 , 17 S.Ct. 581, 584 , 41 L.Ed. 979 (1897). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Carpenter
green
2 sentences1940From this it necessarily follows, it seems to us, that if the part taken be valued as a part of the entire tract of which it forms a part, there would be opportunity for double damages.” The court further said: ( 126 Tex. at page 609 , 89 S.W.2d at page 196) “The true doctrine of just compensation is this: ‘Compensation is awarded not merely for the property taken, but for the taking of the property.’ It necessarily follows that if the part taken is valued in its relation to the whole, and the damage is allowed to the remainder because of the severance of the part taken, there is a duplication 1940From this it necessarily follows, it seems to us, that if the part taken be valued as a part of the entire tract of which it forms a part, there would be opportunity for double damages.” The court further said: ( 126 Tex. at page 609 , 89 S.W.2d at page 196) “The true doctrine of just compensation is this: ‘Compensation is awarded not merely for the property taken, but for the taking of the property.’ It necessarily follows that if the part taken is valued in its relation to the whole, and the damage is allowed to the remainder because of the severance of the part taken, there is a duplication | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.