Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aleong v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.green2 sentences2025We start with the basic premise that “[a]ny person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.” Aleong v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regul., 963 So. 2d 799, 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting Fla. Admin. 2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 3 | 3 |
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahasseegreen2 sentences2026Code 28-106.111(4) (“Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.”); Nicks v. Dep’t of Bus. & Pro., etc., 957 So. 2d 65 , 66 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“When a party waives the right to challenge the factual allegations of an administrative complaint, either by requesting an informal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, or by failing to respond to the complaint at all, the facts of the complaint are deemed to be admitted. “); § 489.129(1) 2018See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error."); Boylan v. Boylan , 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) ("Appellant has the burden of bringing before the appellate court an adequate record to support his appeal."); § 409.2563(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017) ("If the parent from whom support is being sought does not file a timely request for a hearing, the parent will be deemed to have waived the right to request a hearing | 2 | 2 |
Wojnowski v. State, Office of Financial Regulationgreen2 sentences2019Regulation, 98 So. 3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that the appellant, by failing to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting the appellee’s intended action, waived any further opportunity to do so); Aleong v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 963 So. 2d 799, 801-02 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (upholding the Board of Veterinary Medicine’s order granting the Department’s Motion for Waiver of Rights filed after the appellant failed to make a timely request for a hearing to dispute the Department’s allegations); Autoworld of Am. 2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 2 | 2 |
Sterman v. FLA. ST. UNIVERSITY, ETC.green2 sentences1984See Sterman v. Florida State University, 414 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); also see Henry v. State Department of Administration, 431 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wahlquist v. School Board of Liberty County, 423 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). 1983Sterman v. Florida State University Board of Regents, supra. We express no opinion, of course, regarding the merits of any claim appellant may assert with regard to the right to employment in any capacity. | 1 | 2 |
Boylan v. Boylangreen1 sentence2018See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error."); Boylan v. Boylan , 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) ("Appellant has the burden of bringing before the appellate court an adequate record to support his appeal."); § 409.2563(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2017) ("If the parent from whom support is being sought does not file a timely request for a hearing, the parent will be deemed to have waived the right to request a hearing | 1 | 1 |
Autoworld of America Corp. v. Department of Highway Safetygreen1 sentence2014Corp. v. Dep’t of Highway Safety, 754 So.2d 76, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“In order to challenge the factual basis of the complaint, it would have been necessary for Autoworld to request a formal hearing under subsection 120.57(1).”). | 1 | 1 |
Diaz v. State, Department of Business & Professional Regulationgreen1 sentence2014Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that when Wojnowski “failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting OFR’s intended action, he waived any further opportunity to do so,” citing Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106.111(4)); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hear | 1 | 1 |
Velez v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY POLICE DEPT.green1 sentence2006Cf. Velez v. Miami-Dade County Police Dep't, 934 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla.2006) ("This combination of a requirement of notification of the right to the adversarial preliminary hearing and the right to request the hearing indicates that the Legislature intended that the `person entitled to notice' have an opportunity to participate in that hearing."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nicks v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS AND PROF. REG.
green
1 sentence2026Code 28-106.111(4) (“Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing on such matters.”); Nicks v. Dep’t of Bus. & Pro., etc., 957 So. 2d 65 , 66 n.1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“When a party waives the right to challenge the factual allegations of an administrative complaint, either by requesting an informal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, or by failing to respond to the complaint at all, the facts of the complaint are deemed to be admitted. “); § 489.129(1) | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Appel v. FLA., DIV. OF LICENSING
green
1 sentence2002For some unknown reason, it was postmarked the following day. [2] Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-106. 111 provides, in pertinent part: 28-106.111 Point of Entry into Proceedings and Mediation. . . . . (2) Unless otherwise provided by law, persons seeking a hearing on an agency decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing with the agency within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision. . . . . (4) Any person who receives written notice of an agency decision and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Henry v. STATE, DEPT. OF ADMIN., DIV. OF RETIREMENT
green
1 sentence1984See Sterman v. Florida State University, 414 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); also see Henry v. State Department of Administration, 431 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wahlquist v. School Board of Liberty County, 423 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Wahlquist v. School Bd. of Liberty County
green
1 sentence1984See Sterman v. Florida State University, 414 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); also see Henry v. State Department of Administration, 431 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Wahlquist v. School Board of Liberty County, 423 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Gissendaner v. Rich
green
1 sentence1981McDowell, supra . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.