Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2020–2026 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
O'neal v. Stategreen2 sentences2026In considering a claim of cumulative error, we “evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” O’Neal v. State, 316 Ga. 264, 271 (2023). 2026Citing State v. Lane, 308 Ga. 10 (2020), Murphy argues that, “in weighing the prejudicial effect on Murphy’s trial, trial counsel’s deficiency is to be considered cumulatively with any errors by the trial court.” “In considering a claim of cumulative error, we evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” O’Neal v. State, 316 Ga. 264, 271 (2023). | 5 | 5 |
Thrift v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Thrift v. State, 310 Ga. 499, 515 (10) ( 852 SE2d 560 ) (2020) (“in order to establish a claim of cumulative error, a defendant must show . . . that at least two errors were committed in the course of the trial”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 6. 2023Thrift v. State, 310 Ga. 499, 515 (10) ( 852 SE2d 560 ) (2020) (“in order to establish a claim of cumulative error, a defendant must show . . . that at least two errors were committed in the course of the trial”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 6. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Lanegreen2 sentences2026Citing State v. Lane, 308 Ga. 10 (2020), Murphy argues that, “in weighing the prejudicial effect on Murphy’s trial, trial counsel’s deficiency is to be considered cumulatively with any errors by the trial court.” “In considering a claim of cumulative error, we evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” O’Neal v. State, 316 Ga. 264, 271 (2023). 2026Citing State v. Lane, 308 Ga. 10 (2020), Murphy argues that, “in weighing the prejudicial effect on Murphy’s trial, trial counsel’s deficiency is to be considered cumulatively with any errors by the trial court.” “In considering a claim of cumulative error, we evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” O’Neal v. State, 316 Ga. 264, 271 (2023). | 1 | 3 |
Cox v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Hodges and Watkins, JJ., concur. 19 See, e.g., Howard v. State, __ Ga. __ (2) n.2 (Case No. S24A0105, decided Mar. 19, 2024), citing Mims v. State, 310 Ga. 853 , 854 n.2 ( 854 SE2d 742 ) (2021) (“An appealing party may not use its brief to expand its enumeration of errors by arguing the incorrectness of a trial court ruling not mentioned in the enumeration of errors.”). 20 See, e.g., Cox v. State, 306 Ga. 736, 743 (2) (e) ( 832 SE2d 354 ) (2019) (explaining that if the appellate court is reviewing a claim of cumulative error in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court should | 1 | 1 |
Mims v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Hodges and Watkins, JJ., concur. 19 See, e.g., Howard v. State, __ Ga. __ (2) n.2 (Case No. S24A0105, decided Mar. 19, 2024), citing Mims v. State, 310 Ga. 853 , 854 n.2 ( 854 SE2d 742 ) (2021) (“An appealing party may not use its brief to expand its enumeration of errors by arguing the incorrectness of a trial court ruling not mentioned in the enumeration of errors.”). 20 See, e.g., Cox v. State, 306 Ga. 736, 743 (2) (e) ( 832 SE2d 354 ) (2019) (explaining that if the appellate court is reviewing a claim of cumulative error in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court should 2024Hodges and Watkins, JJ., concur. 19 See, e.g., Howard v. State, __ Ga. __ (2) n.2 (Case No. S24A0105, decided Mar. 19, 2024), citing Mims v. State, 310 Ga. 853 , 854 n.2 ( 854 SE2d 742 ) (2021) (“An appealing party may not use its brief to expand its enumeration of errors by arguing the incorrectness of a trial court ruling not mentioned in the enumeration of errors.”). 20 See, e.g., Cox v. State, 306 Ga. 736, 743 (2) (e) ( 832 SE2d 354 ) (2019) (explaining that if the appellate court is reviewing a claim of cumulative error in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court should | 1 | 1 |
Bulloch v. Stategreen2 sentences2023In considering a claim of cumulative error, we “evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Bulloch v. State, 293 Ga. 179, 183 (2) (744 SE2d 763) (2013). 2023In considering a claim of cumulative error, we “evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Bulloch v. State, 293 Ga. 179, 183 (2) (744 SE2d 763) (2013). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.