Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Stategreen2 sentences1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). 1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). | 4 | 4 |
Barnett v. Stategreen2 sentences1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). 1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). | 4 | 4 |
Medina v. Stategreen2 sentences2008“Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.” (Citations omitted.) Medina v. State, 234 Ga. App. 13, 15 (2) ( 505 SE2d 558 ) (1998); see also Davis v. State, 184 Ga. App. 415, 416 (2) ( 361 SE2d 547 ) (1987) (upon inquiry from trial court, defendant’s failure to object to *436 Allen charge constituted waiver). 2008“Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.” (Citations omitted.) Medina v. State, 234 Ga. App. 13, 15 (2) ( 505 SE2d 558 ) (1998); see also Davis v. State, 184 Ga. App. 415, 416 (2) ( 361 SE2d 547 ) (1987) (upon inquiry from trial court, defendant’s failure to object to *436 Allen charge constituted waiver). | 3 | 3 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., Jones v. State, 280 Ga.App. 287, 291 , 633 S.E.2d 806 (2006) ("`Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24(c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.'" (citations omitted)). 2011See, e.g., Jones v. State, 280 Ga.App. 287, 291 , 633 S.E.2d 806 (2006) ("`Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24(c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.'" (citations omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Loadholt v. Stategreen2 sentences2011Accord Loadholt v. State, 286 Ga. 402, 404-405 , 687 S.E.2d 824 (2010) (discussing procedures in place at the time of Loadholt's 2000 trial); Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435 , 438 n. 4, 330 S.E.2d 567 (1985) ("Furthermore, we view the error as substantial and harmful as a matter of law so that it is subject to review by this court. 2011Accord Loadholt v. State, 286 Ga. 402, 404-405 , 687 S.E.2d 824 (2010) (discussing procedures in place at the time of Loadholt's 2000 trial); Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435 , 438 n. 4, 330 S.E.2d 567 (1985) ("Furthermore, we view the error as substantial and harmful as a matter of law so that it is subject to review by this court. | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2008“Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.” (Citations omitted.) Medina v. State, 234 Ga. App. 13, 15 (2) ( 505 SE2d 558 ) (1998); see also Davis v. State, 184 Ga. App. 415, 416 (2) ( 361 SE2d 547 ) (1987) (upon inquiry from trial court, defendant’s failure to object to *436 Allen charge constituted waiver). 2008“Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made or not.” (Citations omitted.) Medina v. State, 234 Ga. App. 13, 15 (2) ( 505 SE2d 558 ) (1998); see also Davis v. State, 184 Ga. App. 415, 416 (2) ( 361 SE2d 547 ) (1987) (upon inquiry from trial court, defendant’s failure to object to *436 Allen charge constituted waiver). | 1 | 1 |
Early v. Stategreen2 sentences1999Marshall made no objection to these jury charges at trial. “[A] failure to object [to a jury charge] in a criminal case constitutes a waiver unless there has been substantial error which is harmful as a matter of law.” Early v. State, 218 Ga. App. 869, 870 ( 463 SE2d 706 ) (1995). 1999Marshall made no objection to these jury charges at trial. “[A] failure to object [to a jury charge] in a criminal case constitutes a waiver unless there has been substantial error which is harmful as a matter of law.” Early v. State, 218 Ga. App. 869, 870 ( 463 SE2d 706 ) (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maynard v. State
green
2 sentences1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). 1991Failure to object to a jury charge in a criminal case constitutes a waiver except where, under OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), "`there has been a substantial error in the charge which was harmful as a matter of law, regardless of whether objection was made hereunder or not.' Maynard v. State, 171 Ga. App. 605 ( 320 SE2d 806 ) (1984)." Barnett v. State, 178 Ga. App. 685, 686 (1) ( 344 SE2d 665 ) (1986); see Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 438-439 (n. 4) ( 330 SE2d 567 ) (1985). | 3 | 1991–1999 |
Renner v. State
green
2 sentences1992In Renner v. State, 260 Ga. 515 ( 397 SE2d 683 ) (1990), the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that giving a jury instruction on flight in a criminal case constitutes error. 1992In Renner v. State, 260 Ga. 515 ( 397 SE2d 683 ) (1990), the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that giving a jury instruction on flight in a criminal case constitutes error. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.