10 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Cobb Countygreen2 sentences2017And in Davis, the Court of Appeals observed that “[t]he object of presenting a claim to a county before the institution of a suit is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation.” 65 Ga. App. at 534 (1). 2009Furthermore, “ ‘the object of presenting a claim to a county before the institution of suit is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation.’ Davis v. Cobb County, 65 Ga. App. 533, 534 ( 15 SE2d 814 ) (1941).” (Punctuation omitted.) Burton v. DeKalb County, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 ( 415 SE2d 647 ) (1992). | 4 | 6 |
Burton v. DeKalb Countygreen2 sentences2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). 2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). | 3 | 3 |
Strickland v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2023Under this provision, “[a]ll claims against counties must be presented within 12 months after they accrue or become payable or the same are barred, provided that minors or other persons laboring under disabilities shall be allowed 12 months after the removal of the disability to present their claims.” The statute “afford[s] the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation.” Strickland v. Wilson, 205 Ga. App. 91, 92 ( 421 SE2d 94 ) (1992) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2023Under this provision, “[a]ll claims against counties must be presented within 12 months after they accrue or become payable or the same are barred, provided that minors or other persons laboring under disabilities shall be allowed 12 months after the removal of the disability to present their claims.” The statute “afford[s] the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation.” Strickland v. Wilson, 205 Ga. App. 91, 92 ( 421 SE2d 94 ) (1992) (citation and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Channell v. Houstongreen2 sentences2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) 2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) | 1 | 1 |
Croy v. Whitfield Countygreen2 sentences2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). 2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
BOARD OF COM'RS OF DOUGHERTY COUNTY v. Sabagreen2 sentences2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) 2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Jacksongreen2 sentences2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was 2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was | 1 | 1 |
City of Columbus v. Barngrovergreen2 sentences2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). 2019City of Columbus v. Barngrover , 250 Ga. App. 589 , 596 (4), 552 S.E.2d 536 (2001) ; accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty. , 202 Ga. App. 676 , 678, 415 S.E.2d 647 (1992) ; see Croy v. Whitfield Cty. , 301 Ga. 380 , 385 (2), 801 S.E.2d 892 (2017) (noting that the purpose of OCGA § 36-11-1"is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation." (citations and punctuation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Wayne County v. Herringreen2 sentences2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was 2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was | 1 | 1 |
Lowe v. Jones Countygreen2 sentences2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was 2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was | 1 | 1 |
Board of Commissioners of Randolph County v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) 2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) | 1 | 1 |
Nichols v. Prathergreen2 sentences2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was 2019But the dissent’s argument 26 See supra notes 19-21. 27 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Brown v. Jackson, 221 Ga. App. 200, 201 (2) ( 470 SE2d 786 ) (1996); Wayne Cty. v. Herrin, 210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) ( 437 SE2d 793 ) (1993). 28 Nichols, 286 Ga. App. at 895 (3); see Lowe v. Jones Cty., 231 Ga. App. 372, 373 (2) ( 499 SE2d 348 ) (1998) (holding that because deputies are employees of the sheriff and not the county, a vicarious liability claim against the county for a deputy’s conduct is precluded); Brown, 221 Ga. App. at 201 (2) (holding that because deputy was | 1 | 1 |
Sikes v. Candler Countygreen2 sentences1989OCGA § 36-11-1 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll claims against counties must be presented within 12 months after they accrue or become payable or the same are barred. . . .” The object of this Code section “ ‘is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation. [Cits.]’ ” Sikes v. Candler County, 247 Ga. 115, 119 ( 274 SE2d 464 ) (1981). 1989OCGA § 36-11-1 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll claims against counties must be presented within 12 months after they accrue or become payable or the same are barred. . . .” The object of this Code section “ ‘is to afford the county an opportunity to investigate the claim and ascertain the evidence and to avoid the incurrence of unnecessary litigation. [Cits.]’ ” Sikes v. Candler County, 247 Ga. 115, 119 ( 274 SE2d 464 ) (1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lawson v. Lincoln County
green
1 sentence2019This, the county may not do,25 and thus any presentment of an ante-litem notice to the county 23 Bd. of Comm’rs. of Randolph Cty. v. Wilson, 260 Ga. 482, 482 ( 396 SE2d 903 ) (1990); accord Channell v. Houston, 287 Ga. 682, 684 ( 699 SE2d 308 ) (2010); Bd. of Comm’rs. of Dougherty Cty. v. Saba, 278 Ga. 176, 177 ( 598 SE2d 437 ) (2004); Lawson, 292 Ga. App. at 529 . 24 City of Columbus v. Barngrover, 250 Ga. App. 589, 596 (4) ( 552 SE2d 536 ) (2001); accord Burton v. DeKalb Cty, 202 Ga. App. 676, 678 (415 SEE2d 647 (1992); see Croy v. Whitfield Cty., 301 Ga. 380, 385 (2) ( 801 SE2d 892 ) (2017) | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Neel v. Commissioners
green
1 sentence1981See 15 CJ 646; Neel v. Bartow County, 94 Ga. 216 ( 21 SE 516 ).” 4 The letter here was sufficient to do that. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Heyman v. Stevens
neutral
1 sentence1981See 15 CJ 646; Neel v. Bartow County, 94 Ga. 216 ( 21 SE 516 ).” 4 The letter here was sufficient to do that. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.