Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regentsgreen2 sentences2024“The purpose of the statute is to provide the government entity with an opportunity to investigate the claim, assess its potential liability, reach a settlement prior to litigation, budget and plan.” Havasupai Tribe v. Ariz. Bd. of Regents, 220 Ariz. 214, 223, ¶ 30 (App. 2008). 2024A statutorily-compliant NOC serves “to provide the government entity with an opportunity to investigate the claim, assess its potential liability, reach a settlement prior to litigation, budget and plan.” Havasupai Tribe of Havasupai Reservation v. Ariz. Bd. of Regents, 220 Ariz. 214, 223, ¶ 30 (App. 2008). | 4 | 5 |
Mammo v. Stategreen2 sentences1990Id. at 466, 534 P.2d at 274 ; see also Creasy v. Coxon, 156 Ariz. 145, 148 , 750 P.2d 903, 906 (App.1987); Mammo v. State, 138 Ariz. 528, 531 , 675 P.2d 1347, 1350 (App.1983). 1990Id. at 466, 534 P.2d at 274 ; see also Creasy v. Coxon, 156 Ariz. 145, 148 , 750 P.2d 903, 906 (App.1987); Mammo v. State, 138 Ariz. 528, 531 , 675 P.2d 1347, 1350 (App.1983). | 2 | 2 |
Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. Housergreen2 sentences2018Havasupai , 220 Ariz. at 223 , ¶ 30 , 204 P.3d at 1072 (citing Deer Valley , 214 Ariz. at 295 , ¶ 6 , 152 P.3d at 492 ). 2008Deer Valley, 214 Ariz. at 295, ¶ 6 , 152 P.3d at 492 . | 1 | 2 |
Barth v. Cochise Countygreen2 sentences2007Barth v. Cochise County, 213 Ariz. 59, 62, ¶9 , 138 P.3d 1186, 1189 (App.2006). 2007Barth v. Cochise County, 213 Ariz. 59, 62, ¶9 , 138 P.3d 1186, 1189 (App.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Creasy v. Coxongreen2 sentences1990Id. at 466, 534 P.2d at 274 ; see also Creasy v. Coxon, 156 Ariz. 145, 148 , 750 P.2d 903, 906 (App.1987); Mammo v. State, 138 Ariz. 528, 531 , 675 P.2d 1347, 1350 (App.1983). 1990Id. at 466, 534 P.2d at 274 ; see also Creasy v. Coxon, 156 Ariz. 145, 148 , 750 P.2d 903, 906 (App.1987); Mammo v. State, 138 Ariz. 528, 531 , 675 P.2d 1347, 1350 (App.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. v. Houser
green
2 sentences2018Havasupai , 220 Ariz. at 223 , ¶ 30 , 204 P.3d at 1072 (citing Deer Valley , 214 Ariz. at 295 , ¶ 6 , 152 P.3d at 492 ). 2008Deer Valley, 214 Ariz. at 295, ¶ 6 , 152 P.3d at 492 . | 2 | 2008–2018 |
State v. Brooks
green
2 sentences1990In State v. Brooks, 23 Ariz.App. 463 , 534 P.2d 271 (App.1975), the court of appeals set forth three recognized purposes of an earlier version of § 12-821: (1) to afford the agency the opportunity to investigate the claim and assess its liability; (2) to afford the agency the opportunity to attain a settlement and avoid costly litigation; and (3) to advise the legislature where settlement could not be achieved. 1990In State v. Brooks, 23 Ariz.App. 463 , 534 P.2d 271 (App.1975), the court of appeals set forth three recognized purposes of an earlier version of § 12-821: (1) to afford the agency the opportunity to investigate the claim and assess its liability; (2) to afford the agency the opportunity to attain a settlement and avoid costly litigation; and (3) to advise the legislature where settlement could not be achieved. | 2 | 1986–1990 |
Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc.
green
2 sentences1985Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., 114 Ariz. 426 , 561 P.2d 750 (App.1977). 1985Lewis v. Midway Lumber, Inc., 114 Ariz. 426 , 561 P.2d 750 (App.1977). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.