general reasonableness standard (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

general reasonableness standard in Iowa

10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (21)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Krepsgreen
iowa · 2002 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019
2 sentences

2019See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 108-09 (1977) (“The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always ‘the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen’s personal security.’” (citation omitted)); Kreps, 650 N.W.2d at 641 (“The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.”).

2018See Pennsylvania v. Mimms , 434 U.S. 106 , 108-09 (1977) ("The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always the reasonableness in all circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." (citation omitted) ); State v. Kreps , 650 N.W.2d 636 , 641 (Iowa 2002) ("The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.").

33
Pennsylvania v. Mimmsgreen
scotus · 1977 · cited in 3 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019
2 sentences

2019See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 108-09 (1977) (“The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always ‘the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen’s personal security.’” (citation omitted)); Kreps, 650 N.W.2d at 641 (“The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.”).

2018See Pennsylvania v. Mimms , 434 U.S. 106 , 108-09 (1977) ("The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always the reasonableness in all circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." (citation omitted) ); State v. Kreps , 650 N.W.2d 636 , 641 (Iowa 2002) ("The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.").

33
Jones v. Stategreen
del · 1999 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
Commonwealth v. Stoutegreen
mass · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Quezadagreen
nh · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Greenfieldgreen
conn · 1993 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
People v. Hillgreen
colo · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitzgreen
scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
Commonwealth v. Matosgreen
pa · 1996 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Hendersongreen
idaho · 1988 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
City of Seattle v. Mesianigreen
wash · 1988 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
State v. Tuckergreen
nj · 1994 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Boyanovskygreen
or · 1987 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
Pimental v. Department of Transportationgreen
ri · 1989 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
State v. Younggreen
wash · 1998 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safetygreen
minn · 1994 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn. 1994); see also State v. Henderson, 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (Idaho 1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S. Ct. 2481 , 110 L.

2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co

11
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.green
minn · 1993 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Quinogreen
haw · 1992 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Claytongreen
mont · 2002 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
State v. Randolphgreen
ca5 · 2002 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

11
Terry v. Ohiogreen
scotus · 1968 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 905 (1968).

1987Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 905 (1968).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard green
scotus · 2016
2 sentences

2017Id. at ___, 136 S. Ct. at 2186 .

2017Id. at ___, 136 S. Ct. at 2186 .

32017–2017
State v. Clayton green
mont · 2002
1 sentence

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

12013–2013
State v. Young green
wash · 1998
1 sentence

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

12013–2013
State v. Jones green
wva · 1995
2 sentences

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v

12013–2013
Whren v. United States green
scotus · 1996
2 sentences

2008Id. (citing Whren, 517 U.S. at 810 , 116 S.Ct. at 1772 , 135 L.Ed.2d at 95 ).

2008Id. (citing Whren, 517 U.S. at 810 , 116 S.Ct. at 1772 , 135 L.Ed.2d at 95 ).

12008–2008
State v. Scott green
iowa · 1987
1 sentence

2002Scott, 409 N.W.2d at 467 .

12002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IA § Iowa Code § 124.401 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 321J.10 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 321J.6 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 321J.8 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 321J.9 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 462A.13 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 462A.14C (3) IA § Iowa Code § 462A.14D (3) IA § Iowa Code § 462A.2 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 804.20 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 808.3 (3) IA § Iowa Code § 903.1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 27 (2013–2025) IL 10 (1992–2026) IA 10 (1987–2019) CA 7 (1967–2025) MN 6 (2007–2016) ND 3 (2013–2015) PA 3 (1978–2009) MD 3 (1978–1998) MO 3 (2002–2013) VT 2 (2001–2018) AK 2 (1979–2020) ID 2 (1989–1993) WA 2 (2007–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check