Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Krepsgreen2 sentences2019See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 108-09 (1977) (“The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always ‘the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen’s personal security.’” (citation omitted)); Kreps, 650 N.W.2d at 641 (“The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.”). 2018See Pennsylvania v. Mimms , 434 U.S. 106 , 108-09 (1977) ("The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always the reasonableness in all circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." (citation omitted) ); State v. Kreps , 650 N.W.2d 636 , 641 (Iowa 2002) ("The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures."). | 3 | 3 |
Pennsylvania v. Mimmsgreen2 sentences2019See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 108-09 (1977) (“The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always ‘the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen’s personal security.’” (citation omitted)); Kreps, 650 N.W.2d at 641 (“The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures.”). 2018See Pennsylvania v. Mimms , 434 U.S. 106 , 108-09 (1977) ("The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always the reasonableness in all circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." (citation omitted) ); State v. Kreps , 650 N.W.2d 636 , 641 (Iowa 2002) ("The Fourth Amendment imposes a general reasonableness standard upon all searches and seizures."). | 3 | 3 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Stoutegreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Quezadagreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Greenfieldgreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hillgreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitzgreen2 sentences2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Matosgreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
City of Seattle v. Mesianigreen2 sentences2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tuckergreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Boyanovskygreen2 sentences2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
Pimental v. Department of Transportationgreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
State v. Younggreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
Ascher v. Commissioner of Public Safetygreen2 sentences2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn. 1994); see also State v. Henderson, 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (Idaho 1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S. Ct. 2481 , 110 L. 2013Safety, 519 N.W.2d 183, 187 (Minn.1994); see also State v. Henderson, 114 Idaho 293 , 756 P.2d 1057, 1063 (1988) (invalidating sobriety checkpoint where police lack express legislative authority, particularized suspicion, and judicial approval on state constitutional grounds prior to United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold them on a general reasonableness standard in Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 , 110 S.Ct. 2481 , 110 L.Ed.2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 304 Or. 131 , 743 P.2d 711, 712 (1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state co | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Welfare of E.D.J.green2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Quinogreen2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Claytongreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
State v. Randolphgreen2 sentences2013Ed. 2d 412 (1990)); State v. Boyanovsky, 743 P.2d 711, 712 (Or. 1987) (invalidating warrantless sobriety roadblock under state constitution prior to United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sitz); Pimental v. Dep’t of Transp., 561 A.2d 1348, 1352 (R.I. 1989) (same); City of Seattle v. Mesiani, 755 P.2d 775, 777 (Wash. 1988) (same); 2 Friesen § 11.09, at 11–110 to 11– 112 & n.479. 40See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735 , 738–39 (Colo. 1996); State v. Greenfield, 634 A.2d 879, 883 (Conn. 1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del. 1999); State v. Quino, 840 P.2d 358, 362 (Haw. 1992); Comm 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 1 |
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences1987Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 905 (1968). 1987Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 905 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert Bernard
green
2 sentences2017Id. at ___, 136 S. Ct. at 2186 . 2017Id. at ___, 136 S. Ct. at 2186 . | 3 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Clayton
green
1 sentence2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Young
green
1 sentence2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v 2013See, e.g., People v. Hill, 929 P.2d 735, 738-39 (Colo.1996); State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 634 A.2d 879, 883 (1993); Jones v. State, 745 A.2d 856, 869 (Del.1999); State v. Quino, 74 Haw. 161 , 840 P.2d 358, 362 (1992); Commonwealth v. Stoute, 422 Mass. 782 , 665 N.E.2d 93, 95-98 (1996); In re Welfare of E.D.J., 502 N.W.2d 779, 783 (Minn.1993); State v. Clayton, 309 Mont. 215 , 45 P.3d 30, 34 (2002); State v. Quezada, 141 N.H. 258 , 681 A.2d 79, 80-81 (1996); State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158 , 642 A.2d 401, 405-06 (1994); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769, 776 (1996); State v | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Whren v. United States
green
2 sentences2008Id. (citing Whren, 517 U.S. at 810 , 116 S.Ct. at 1772 , 135 L.Ed.2d at 95 ). 2008Id. (citing Whren, 517 U.S. at 810 , 116 S.Ct. at 1772 , 135 L.Ed.2d at 95 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Scott
green
1 sentence2002Scott, 409 N.W.2d at 467 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.