Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.green2 sentences2019“Under the doctrine of last preceding antecedent, qualifying words and phrases refer only to the immediately preceding antecedent, unless a contrary legislative intent appears.” Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Shell Oil Co., 606 N.W.2d 376, 380 (Iowa 2000) (en banc). 2019"Under the doctrine of last preceding antecedent, qualifying words and phrases refer only to the immediately preceding antecedent, unless a contrary legislative intent appears." Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Shell Oil Co. , 606 N.W.2d 376 , 380 (Iowa 2000) (en banc). | 6 | 6 |
State v. Lohrgreen2 sentences2000State v. Lohr, 266 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 1978). 1989See State v. Lohr, 266 N.W.2d 1, 3-4 (Iowa 1978); 2A Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 47.33 (4th ed. 1984). | 3 | 3 |
Liquidation v. Iowa Dept. of Transportationgreen1 sentence2025See RPC Liquidation, 717 N.W.2d at 322 . | 1 | 1 |
Robert Oberbillig and Patricia Oberbillig and Frank Scaglione and Melba Scaglione v. West Grand Towers Condominium Associationgreen1 sentence2014Ass’n, 807 N.W.2d 143, 151 (Iowa 2011) (explaining doctrine of the last preceding antecedent). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.