10 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2017State v. Johnson, 126 Idaho 859, 863 , 893 P.2d 806, 810 (Ct. App. 1995). 2017State v. Johnson, 126 Idaho 859, 863 , 893 P.2d 806, 810 (Ct. App. 1995). | 6 | 6 |
State v. Dunngreen2 sentences2016Dunn, 134 Idaho at 169 , 997 P.2d at 630 . 2016Dunn, 134 Idaho at 169 , 997 P.2d at 630 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Alger
green
2 sentences2000State v. Johnson, 126 Idaho 859, 863 , 893 P.2d 806, 810 (Ct.App.1995); Alger, 115 Idaho at 46 , 764 P.2d at 123 . 2000State v. Johnson, 126 Idaho 859, 863 , 893 P.2d 806, 810 (Ct.App.1995); Alger, 115 Idaho at 46 , 764 P.2d at 123 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Randles
green
2 sentences1997However, the Supreme Court, in State v. Randles, 117 Idaho 344 , 787 P.2d 1152 (1990), rejected applying Holder as an appellate review standard, finding: To require the court at the appellate level to evaluate whether the evidence suggests any reasonable hypothesis which is consistent with the innocence of a defendant already convicted by a jury would be an impermissible usurpation of the role of the trier of fact. 1997However, the Supreme Court, in State v. Randles, 117 Idaho 344 , 787 P.2d 1152 (1990), rejected applying Holder as an appellate review standard, finding: To require the court at the appellate level to evaluate whether the evidence suggests any reasonable hypothesis which is consistent with the innocence of a defendant already convicted by a jury would be an impermissible usurpation of the role of the trier of fact. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Hall
green
1 sentence1995Id. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.