Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. Mooregreen2 sentences2026Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 25A-CT-177 | April 8, 2026 Page 33 of 41 [60] “In the appellate review of a claim of insufficient evidence in a civil case, we affirm a verdict when, considering the probative evidence and reasonable inferences, a reasonable jury could have arrived at the same determination.” TRW Vehicle Safety Sys., Inc. v. Moore, 936 N.E.2d 201, 208 (Ind. 2010) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 2016TRW Vehicle Safety Sys., Inc. v. Moore, 936 N.E.2d 201, 209 (Ind.2010). | 2 | 2 |
Gary Community School Corp. v. Powellgreen1 sentence2010Corp. v. Powell, 906 N.E.2d 823, 830 (Ind.2009). | 1 | 1 |
Scisney v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Scisney v. State, 701 N.E.2d 847, 849 (Ind.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bivins v. State
green
1 sentence1995As stated in Bivins v. State (1982) Ind., 433 N.E.2d 387 , 391-92: "It is well established that when this Court is confronted with a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we are required to examine the evidence most favorable to the fact-finder's conclusion, together with the reasonable inferences arising therefrom. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. Scott
green
2 sentences1980Citing Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. Scott, (1973) 261 Ind. 27 , 300 N.E.2d 50 , Johnson argues: “even if the jury’s verdict were supported by sufficient evidence and were not contrary to law under the appellate review standard (a point not conceded) the trial court is still empowered in his role as a ‘thirteenth juror’ to set aside the jury’s verdict to prevent injustice. 1980Citing Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. Scott, (1973) 261 Ind. 27 , 300 N.E.2d 50 , Johnson argues: “even if the jury’s verdict were supported by sufficient evidence and were not contrary to law under the appellate review standard (a point not conceded) the trial court is still empowered in his role as a ‘thirteenth juror’ to set aside the jury’s verdict to prevent injustice. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wrassman v. State
green
2 sentences1978Relative to this question, of whether the appellate review standard can in any way change depending on the nature of the evidence being reviewed, the statement in the 1921 Wrassman case, supra, 191 Ind. at 403 , 132 N.E. at 674 , has continuing validity: “Decisions are evidence of the law. 1978Relative to this question, of whether the appellate review standard can in any way change depending on the nature of the evidence being reviewed, the statement in the 1921 Wrassman case, supra, 191 Ind. at 403 , 132 N.E. at 674 , has continuing validity: “Decisions are evidence of the law. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.