Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2021 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Easterling v. Kendall, M.D.green2 sentences2021“In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a sanction for a discovery violation, [the Court] must first determine whether a discovery violation occurred.” Easterling v. Kendall, 159 Idaho 902, 909 , 367 P.3d 1214, 1221 (2016) (internal quotations omitted). 2021“In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a sanction for a discovery violation, [the Court] must first determine whether a discovery violation occurred.” Easterling v. Kendall, 159 Idaho 902, 909 , 367 P.3d 1214, 1221 (2016) (internal quotations omitted). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Allengreen2 sentences2019State v. Allen, 145 Idaho 183, 185 , 177 P.3d 397, 399 (Ct. App. 2008). 2019State v. Allen, 145 Idaho 183, 185 , 177 P.3d 397, 399 (Ct. App. 2008). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Stradleygreen2 sentences2016In “determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a sanction for a discovery violation, we must first determine whether a discovery violation occurred.” Stradley, 127 Idaho at 208 , 899 P.2d at 421 . 2016In “determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in imposing a sanction for a discovery violation, we must first determine whether a discovery violation occurred.” Stradley, 127 Idaho at 208 , 899 P.2d at 421 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Huntsmangreen2 sentences2021State v. Huntsman, 146 Idaho 580, 586 , 199 P.3d 155, 161 (Ct. App. 2008). 2021State v. Huntsman, 146 Idaho 580, 586 , 199 P.3d 155, 161 (Ct. App. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Harrisgreen2 sentences1999State v. Harris, 132 Idaho 843 , 979 P.2d 1201, 1205 (1999); State v. Lamphere, 130 Idaho 630, 633 , 945 P.2d 1, 4 (1997). 1999State v. Harris, 132 Idaho 843 , 979 P.2d 1201, 1205 (1999); State v. Lamphere, 130 Idaho 630, 633 , 945 P.2d 1, 4 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lampheregreen2 sentences1999State v. Harris, 132 Idaho 843 , 979 P.2d 1201, 1205 (1999); State v. Lamphere, 130 Idaho 630, 633 , 945 P.2d 1, 4 (1997). 1999State v. Harris, 132 Idaho 843 , 979 P.2d 1201, 1205 (1999); State v. Lamphere, 130 Idaho 630, 633 , 945 P.2d 1, 4 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Justin Lee Wilson
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.