Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Arthur H.green2 sentences2024“Each petition alleging an injurious environment is unique, and must be decided according to the circumstances of that case.” In re N.B., 191 Ill. 2d 338 , 346 (2000). ¶ 89 Shaniqua insists that “[t]he only theory of neglect of the girls was ‘anticipatory neglect’ based on the findings [of abuse] with respect to D.F.” Under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect, “ ‘the State seeks to protect not only children who are the direct victims of neglect or abuse, but also those who have a probability to be subject to neglect or abuse because they reside, or in the future may reside, with an individual 2016See Arthur H., 212 Ill. 2d at 477-78 . 19 1-15-0956 ¶ 33 From this, however, respondent blindly leaps to the unfounded conclusion that the doctrine of anticipatory neglect can only be applied in cases where, as in Arthur H., the minor at issue has siblings and the parent at issue is responsible for them. | 4 | 5 |
In re Zion M.green2 sentences2024“Each petition alleging an injurious environment is unique, and must be decided according to the circumstances of that case.” In re N.B., 191 Ill. 2d 338 , 346 (2000). ¶ 89 Shaniqua insists that “[t]he only theory of neglect of the girls was ‘anticipatory neglect’ based on the findings [of abuse] with respect to D.F.” Under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect, “ ‘the State seeks to protect not only children who are the direct victims of neglect or abuse, but also those who have a probability to be subject to neglect or abuse because they reside, or in the future may reside, with an individual 2022In dismissing the State’s petition for adjudication of wardship, the court specifically stated that, under the anticipatory neglect doctrine, it had to evaluate the individual with whom the child will live, “not merely the circumstances that existed at the time of the incident involving the child’s sibling.” The court then concluded that it had not “seen a scintilla of evidence that anything ever happened inside that household at any point until the unfortunate - 18 - No. 1-21-1092 event on January 11th.” Because the anticipatory neglect doctrine did not apply to Angela P., as an after-born si | 1 | 3 |
In re Angela P.green1 sentence2024See In re Angela P., 2022 IL App (1st) 211092, ¶¶ 58-59 (explaining “a case of pure anticipatory neglect applies only if the minor at issue had not been born yet at the time of the” prior abuse or neglect by the parents). | 1 | 1 |
In re Erin A.green1 sentence2021See also In re Erin A., 2012 IL App (1st) 120050, ¶ 34 (noting that the anticipatory neglect doctrine recognizes that a parent’s treatment of one child is probative of how that parent may treat his or her other children). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re NB
green
1 sentence2024“Each petition alleging an injurious environment is unique, and must be decided according to the circumstances of that case.” In re N.B., 191 Ill. 2d 338 , 346 (2000). ¶ 89 Shaniqua insists that “[t]he only theory of neglect of the girls was ‘anticipatory neglect’ based on the findings [of abuse] with respect to D.F.” Under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect, “ ‘the State seeks to protect not only children who are the direct victims of neglect or abuse, but also those who have a probability to be subject to neglect or abuse because they reside, or in the future may reside, with an individual | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re Z.L.
green
1 sentence2021Citing In re Zion, 2015 IL App (1st) 151119 , the appellate court then stated that, under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect, it had to evaluate the individual with whom the children will live. 2020 IL App (1st) 200151 , ¶ 27. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re Jordyn L.
green
2 sentences2016From this, she insists that the trial court's misapplication of the doctrine requires reversal of her cause. ¶ 17 Our very court has just recently dealt with this precise matter in In re Jordyn L., 2016 IL App (1st) 150956 , a case which we find to be directly on point and wholly dispositive of respondent's contention. ¶ 18 In Jordyn L., the trial court, following an adjudicatory hearing, found the minor to be neglected due to injurious environment and abused due to substantial risk of physical injury " 'under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect.' " Jordyn L., 2016 IL App (1st) 150956, ¶ 23 . 2016From this, she insists that the trial court's misapplication of the doctrine requires reversal of her cause. ¶ 17 Our very court has just recently dealt with this precise matter in In re Jordyn L., 2016 IL App (1st) 150956 , a case which we find to be directly on point and wholly dispositive of respondent's contention. ¶ 18 In Jordyn L., the trial court, following an adjudicatory hearing, found the minor to be neglected due to injurious environment and abused due to substantial risk of physical injury " 'under the doctrine of anticipatory neglect.' " Jordyn L., 2016 IL App (1st) 150956, ¶ 23 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.