bases claim in Illinois

2006For example, in Azzano, the appellate court determined that "killerball" was a contact sport; it noted that "a certain amount of physical contact was inevitable in the game of killerball and *** the parties voluntarily assented to the contact by participating." Azzano, 304 Ill.

2006For example, in Azzano, the appellate court determined that “killerball” was a contact sport; it noted that “a certain amount of physical contact was inevitable in the game of killerball and *** the parties voluntarily assented to the contact by participating.” Azzano, 304 Ill.

2003The court thereby affirmed the trial court's ability to dismiss a successive post-conviction petition on the bases of waiver and res judicata in the first stage of review." Smith, 341 Ill.App.3d at 538 , 276 Ill.Dec. 472 , 794 N.E.2d 367 .

2003The court thereby affirmed the trial court's ability to dismiss a successive post-conviction petition on the bases of waiver and res judicata in the first stage of review." Smith, 341 Ill.App.3d at 538 , 276 Ill.Dec. 472 , 794 N.E.2d 367 .

2020Relevant here, defendant alleged -7- No. 1-18-0946 counsel’s failure to object to the state’s characterization of him as a “rapist” during it’s opening statement and closing arguments and counsel’s failure to investigate the crime scene or the victim’s background. ¶ 28 Pursuant to People v. Krankel, 102 Ill. 2d 181 (1984) and its progeny, the court continued the matter to conduct a preliminary inquiry into the factual basis of the claims to determine whether appointment of new counsel to represent defendant was warranted. ¶ 29 At the next court date, the trial court explained the procedure for

1985(People v. Lewis (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 129 , 430 N.E.2d 1346 .) Since the evidence is not closely balanced in the light of the positive identifications made by complainant, the plain-error rule does not apply (People v. Buckner (1984), 121 Ill.

1985(People v. Lewis (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 129 , 430 N.E.2d 1346 .) Since the evidence is not closely balanced in the light of the positive identifications made by complainant, the plain-error rule does not apply (People v. Buckner (1984), 121 Ill.

1985(People v. Lewis (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 129 , 430 N.E.2d 1346 .) Since the evidence is not closely balanced in the light of the positive identifications made by complainant, the plain-error rule does not apply (People v. Buckner (1984), 121 Ill.

1976Rawleigh Medical Co., 282 Ill. 366 , 118 N.E. 763 .) Therefore, we cannot consider the legal consequences of the fact that Dr. Rosenbaum never signed nor verified the allegations he made against his wife, allegations that were the bases for his claim for divorce.

1976Rawleigh Medical Co., 282 Ill. 366 , 118 N.E. 763 .) Therefore, we cannot consider the legal consequences of the fact that Dr. Rosenbaum never signed nor verified the allegations he made against his wife, allegations that were the bases for his claim for divorce.

1960The bases for the rule, which admit of no distinctions between a sentence imposed after a plea of guilty and one imposed after a trial by the court on a plea of not guilty, are most eloquently and adequately expressed in Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 , 93 L.ed. 1337, a decision which likewise holds that it is not a denial of due process for the court to take into consideration information concerning the convicted person’s previous activities which could not have been brought to the attention of a jury.

1953It is the plaintiff’s initial contention that Moore v. Moyle, 405 Ill. 555 is, by analogy, decisive of this case.