defendant forfeits claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

defendant forfeits claim in Illinois

10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2026 9 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Hilliergreen
ill · 2010 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2025–2026
2 sentences

2026However, he contends the error may be reviewed under the plain-error doctrine because a clear or obvious error occurred and the evidence at his resentencing was closely balanced. ¶ 39 Generally, a defendant forfeits a claim of sentencing error by failing to preserve the error through “both a contemporaneous objection and a written postsentencing motion raising the issue.” People v. Hillier, 237 Ill. 2d 539, 544 (2010).

2025People v. Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶ 39 ; People v. Hillier, 237 Ill. 2d 539, 547 (2010) (defendant’s fifth amendment challenge to his sex- offender evaluation was not raised at trial and was thus forfeited); People v. Ivanchuk, 2025 IL App (4th) 241230, ¶ 42 (defendant forfeited fourth-amendment challenge to vehicle stop by failing to raise it at trial). ¶ 43 There are a few exceptions to forfeiture.

22
People v. Ivanchukgreen
illappct · 2025 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025People v. Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶ 39 ; People v. Hillier, 237 Ill. 2d 539, 547 (2010) (defendant’s fifth amendment challenge to his sex- offender evaluation was not raised at trial and was thus forfeited); People v. Ivanchuk, 2025 IL App (4th) 241230, ¶ 42 (defendant forfeited fourth-amendment challenge to vehicle stop by failing to raise it at trial). ¶ 43 There are a few exceptions to forfeiture.

11
People v. Petrenkogreen
ill · 2010 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023People v. Petrenko, 237 Ill. 2d 490 , 502-03 (2010); 725 ILCS 5/122-3 (West 2020) (“Any claim of substantial denial of constitutional rights not raised in the original or an amended petition is waived.”). 3 We do not have supervisory authority to excuse forfeiture caused by a defendant’s failure to include an issue in his postconviction petition.

11
People v. Pearsongreen
ill · 1981 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022People v. Pearson, 88 Ill. 2d 210, 217 , 430 N.E.2d 990, 993 (1981).

2022People v. Pearson, 88 Ill. 2d 210, 217 , 430 N.E.2d 990, 993 (1981).

11
People v. Austingreen
illappct · 2017 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021People v. Austin, 2017 IL App (1st) 142737, ¶ 46 (a defendant forfeits a claim of jury instruction error unless he or she objected to the instruction or offered an alternative instruction and raised the instruction issue in a posttrial motion).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Thompson green
ill · 2010
2 sentences

2023Id.

2023Id.

32023–2023
People v. Thompson green
ill · 2015
2 sentences

2025People v. Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶ 39 ; People v. Hillier, 237 Ill. 2d 539, 547 (2010) (defendant’s fifth amendment challenge to his sex- offender evaluation was not raised at trial and was thus forfeited); People v. Ivanchuk, 2025 IL App (4th) 241230, ¶ 42 (defendant forfeited fourth-amendment challenge to vehicle stop by failing to raise it at trial). ¶ 43 There are a few exceptions to forfeiture.

2020In Thompson, 2015 IL 118151, ¶ 44 , the defendant forfeited his as-applied Miller challenge by raising it for the first time on appeal, but the court did not remand for the defendant to amend his section 2-1401 petition; -4- No. 1-16-3177 rather, it affirmed the dismissal of the petition and noted that the defendant could file a successive section 2-1401 or postconviction petition.

22020–2025
People v. Smart green
ill · 2025
1 sentence

2026People v. Smart, 2025 IL 130127, ¶ 77 .

12026–2026

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05 (3) IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 41 (2012–2026) IL 10 (2020–2026) TX 6 (2011–2021) MI 3 (2001–2019) AZ 2 (2013–2019) GU 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check