Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kostecki v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.green2 sentences2026Again, I disagree. ¶ 129 “Where a collective bargaining agreement establishes a grievance and arbitration procedure for disputes arising out of the agreement, an employee alleging a violation of the agreement must attempt to exhaust his or her contractual remedies before seeking judicial relief.” Kostecki v. Dominick’s Finer Foods, Inc., of Illinois, 361 Ill. 2023The court then noted that, “[w]here a collective bargaining agreement establishes a grievance and arbitration procedure for disputes arising out of the agreement, an employee alleging a violation of the agreement must attempt to exhaust his or her contractual remedies before seeking judicial relief.” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 369 . | 3 | 4 |
Gelb v. Air Con Refrigeration & Heating, Inc.green2 sentences2026App. 3d 362, 369 (2005) (citing Gelb, 356 Ill. 2008See Gelb v. Air Con Refrigeration & Heating, Inc., 356 Ill. | 2 | 5 |
Uehlein v. Shwachmangreen2 sentences2005Uehlein v. Shwachman, 156 Ill. 1996Uehlein v. Shwachman, 156 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.