10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community Affairsgreen2 sentences2017Moreover, board members comprising the agency decision maker are assumed to be people “ ‘of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.’ ” Abrahamson, 153 Ill. 2d at 95 (quoting Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community Affairs, 84 Ill. 2d 42, 55 (1981)). ¶ 63 Thus, we will review the Board’s supplemental factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated unmodified into the Board’s decision, to determine whether those findings were against the manifest weight of 2016Moreover, board members comprising the agency decision maker are assumed to be people “ ‘of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.’ ” Abrahamson, 153 Ill. 2d at 95 (quoting Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community Affairs, 84 Ill. 2d 42, 55 (1981)). ¶ 63 Thus, we will review the Board’s supplemental factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated unmodified into the Board’s decision, to determine whether those findings were against the manifest - 22 - we | 3 | 3 |
Golab v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences1997Abrahamson , 153 Ill. 2d at 88 ; Golab v. Department of Employment Security , 281 Ill. 1997Abrahamson, 153 Ill. 2d at 88 ; Golab v. Department of Employment Security, 281 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
BD. OF EDUC. OF ROUND LAKE AREA SCHOOLS v. State Bd. of Educ.green2 sentences2012We need not address the remaining issues. ¶ 11 A. Section 24A-5 and Strict Compliance ¶ 12 On review, “we are limited to ascertaining whether the factual findings of the hearing officer are against the manifest weight of the evidence.” Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 292 Ill. 2012App. 3d 101, 109 , 685 N.E.2d 412, 417 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences2017Moreover, board members comprising the agency decision maker are assumed to be people “ ‘of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.’ ” Abrahamson, 153 Ill. 2d at 95 (quoting Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community Affairs, 84 Ill. 2d 42, 55 (1981)). ¶ 63 Thus, we will review the Board’s supplemental factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated unmodified into the Board’s decision, to determine whether those findings were against the manifest weight of 2016Moreover, board members comprising the agency decision maker are assumed to be people “ ‘of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.’ ” Abrahamson, 153 Ill. 2d at 95 (quoting Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community Affairs, 84 Ill. 2d 42, 55 (1981)). ¶ 63 Thus, we will review the Board’s supplemental factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated unmodified into the Board’s decision, to determine whether those findings were against the manifest - 22 - we | 5 | 1997–2017 |
Beggs v. The Board of Education of Murphysboro Community Unit School District No. 186
green
2 sentences2025Using the standard of review set forth in Beggs v. Board of Education of Murphysboro Community Unit School District No. 186, 2016 IL 120236 , we agree. ¶ 39 In considering Bulow’s appeal, we must review the Board’s factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated into the Board’s decision, to determine first whether those findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence. 2022First, “we will review the Board’s supplemental factual findings, as well as the factual findings of the hearing officer that were incorporated unmodified into the Board’s decision, to determine whether those findings were against the manifest weight of the evidence.” Id. | 2 | 2022–2025 |
In Re Harris
green
1 sentence1989(In re Harris (1982), 93 Ill. 2d 285, 295 .) Accordingly, the factual findings of the hearing panel are accorded deference. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
In Re Ushijima
green
1 sentence1989(In re Ushijima (1987), 119 Ill. 2d 51, 56-57 .) Our review of the record in this case satisfies us that the findings of fact made by the hearing panel are supported by clear and convincing evidence. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
In Re Wigoda
green
1 sentence1989(See, e.g., In re Anglin (1988), 122 Ill. 2d 531, 538 ; In re Wigoda (1979), 77 Ill. 2d 154, 158-59 .) The hearing panel’s finding on the Jones matter is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and we see no reason to disturb that finding. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
In Re Anglin
green
1 sentence1989(See, e.g., In re Anglin (1988), 122 Ill. 2d 531, 538 ; In re Wigoda (1979), 77 Ill. 2d 154, 158-59 .) The hearing panel’s finding on the Jones matter is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and we see no reason to disturb that finding. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.