Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dusseau v. METRO. DADE CO. BD. OF COM'RSgreen1 sentence2015Dusseau, 794 So.2d at 1272 (“We find that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it rewéighed evidence and completely ignored evidence that supported the Commission’s ruling.”). | 1 | 1 |
Mathis v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'Ngreen1 sentence2007Mathis, 944 So.2d at 1183 (internal citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Richardson v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'Ngreen1 sentence2006See Richardson, 924 So.2d at 911 . | 1 | 1 |
Sweetwater Util. Corp. v. Hillsborough Cty.green1 sentence1996See § 120.52(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Young v. Department of Community Affairs, 625 So.2d 831, 835 (Fla.1993); Hill v. Monroe County, 581 So.2d 225, 226-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Sweetwater Utility Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 314 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); The Florida Bar, Florida Administrative Practice § 2.2, at 2-10 (4th ed. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Monroe Countygreen1 sentence1996See § 120.52(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Young v. Department of Community Affairs, 625 So.2d 831, 835 (Fla.1993); Hill v. Monroe County, 581 So.2d 225, 226-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Sweetwater Utility Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 314 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); The Florida Bar, Florida Administrative Practice § 2.2, at 2-10 (4th ed. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Young v. Department of Community Affairsgreen1 sentence1996See § 120.52(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993); Young v. Department of Community Affairs, 625 So.2d 831, 835 (Fla.1993); Hill v. Monroe County, 581 So.2d 225, 226-27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Sweetwater Utility Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 314 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); The Florida Bar, Florida Administrative Practice § 2.2, at 2-10 (4th ed. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Orlando General Hosp. v. DHRSgreen1 sentence1991See Orlando General Hosp. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 567 So.2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990; Smith v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 555 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); B.B. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Gallion v. Belkgreen1 sentence1985See Gallion v. Belk, 180 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), cert, denied, 188 So.2d 822 (Fla.1966) (upon failure to present the entire record, appellate court must accept all findings of fact made by lower tribunal). | 1 | 1 |
Goldstein v. Pettingergreen1 sentence1985See Gallion v. Belk, 180 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), cert, denied, 188 So.2d 822 (Fla.1966) (upon failure to present the entire record, appellate court must accept all findings of fact made by lower tribunal). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Julian v. Julian
green
2 sentences2014Nonetheless, it held that “this testimonial evidence is flatly contradict [sic] by- the objective evidence on the videotape.” It concluded that in “[viewing the entire record evidence, neither the testimony of Deputy Saunders nor the arrest and booking report constitutes competent substantial evidence on which the hearing officer could rely.” Acknowledging that it could not reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the hearing officer, it supported its approach by relying on Julian v. Julian, 188 So.2d 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), for the proposition that “where the evidence is ob 2014Nonetheless, it held that “this testimonial evidence is flatly contradict [sic] by the objective evidence on the videotape.” It concluded that in “[v]iewing the entire record evidence, neither the testimony of Deputy Saunders nor the arrest and booking report constitutes competent substantial evidence on which the hearing officer could rely.” Acknowledging that it could not reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the hearing officer, it supported its approach by relying on Julian v. Julian, 188 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), for the proposition that “where the evidence is o | 3 | 2014–2014 |
State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Wiggins
green
1 sentence2015Similarly in Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Wiggins, 151 So.3d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), rev. granted, Wiggins v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, No. SC14-2195, 2014 WL 7251666 (Fla. Dec. 17, 2014), a hearing officer issued a suspension order, but the circuit court reversed “after independently reviewing the- [officer’s car’s] video” and holding “that the administrative order was flawed because the video contradicted the officer’s testimony and report.” The circuit court “conceded” that the officer’s testimony coupled with his report supported the factual findin | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Smith v. DHRS
green
1 sentence1991See Orlando General Hosp. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 567 So.2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990; Smith v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 555 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); B.B. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bb v. Dept. of Health & Rehab. Serv.
green
1 sentence1991See Orlando General Hosp. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 567 So.2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990; Smith v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 555 So.2d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); B.B. v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.